EndCCPWorld.com

何俊仁Albert Ho

← 返回人物索引← Back to people index

一、律师与从政之路（1951—2019）1. Lawyer and Legislator (1951–2019)

何俊仁1951年12月1日生于香港，香港大学法律学士，1977年取得事务律师执业资格，创办律师事务所执业至今。1988年起他任太平绅士及国际公证人。他早年参与保钓运动，其后投身政党政治：1990年参与创立香港民主同盟，1994年合并组建民主党，2006年至2012年任民主党主席。1995年他当选立法局议员，1998年至2016年间断续担任立法会议员近二十年，并任屯门区议员多年（2000—2015）。在议会内，他长期跟进法律、保安与人权议题，是民主派阵营的资深人物。Albert Ho Chun-yan was born in Hong Kong on December 1, 1951. He took a law degree at the University of Hong Kong, qualified as a solicitor in 1977, and practised with his own firm. From 1988 he served as a Justice of the Peace and a notary public. He came up through the Diaoyu Islands defence movement into party politics: co-founding the United Democrats in 1990, merging it into the Democratic Party in 1994, and chairing the Democratic Party from 2006 to 2012. Elected to the Legislative Council in 1995, he served as a legislator on and off for nearly twenty years to 2016, alongside years as a Tuen Mun district councillor (2000–2015), and was a senior figure in the pro-democracy camp on legal, security and human-rights questions.

何俊仁的另一重身份在内地维权圈：他长期担任中国维权律师关注组主席，关注组为内地被打压的维权律师提供声援与法律协助。2006年8月，他在参加一场游行后于中环一家快餐店内遭数名男子以木棍袭击，头破血流送院——袭击者动机从未查明，此事被视为香港民主派人士遭遇暴力威胁的早期标志。2014年至2019年，他出任支联会主席，其后改任副主席，直至支联会解散。Ho had a second identity in mainland rights circles: for years he chaired the China Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group, which supported and publicised the cases of persecuted mainland lawyers. In August 2006, after a protest march, he was beaten with sticks by several men inside a Central fast-food restaurant and hospitalised with head injuries; the attackers' motive was never established, and the assault became an early marker of violent intimidation against Hong Kong democrats. From 2014 to 2019 he chaired the Hong Kong Alliance, then served as its vice-chair until the Alliance was dissolved.

二、支联会与三十年的维园烛光2. The Alliance and Thirty Years of Candles in Victoria Park

香港市民支援爱国民主运动联合会（支联会）于1989年5月北京学运期间成立，五大纲领为：释放民运人士、平反八九民运、追究屠杀责任、结束一党专政、建设民主中国。自1990年起，支联会每年6月4日晚在维多利亚公园举办烛光悼念晚会，是全球规模最大的六四纪念活动，2019年有约十八万人参加。何俊仁是晚会三十年不缺席的组织者之一：台上领颂悼词、台下处理警方交涉与法律风险，是他的固定角色。The Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China was founded in May 1989 during the Beijing student movement. Its five operational goals were: release democracy activists, vindicate the 1989 movement, hold those responsible for the killings to account, end one-party dictatorship, and build a democratic China. From 1990 the Alliance held a candlelight vigil in Victoria Park every June 4 — the world's largest Tiananmen commemoration, drawing some 180,000 people in 2019. Ho was one of its thirty-year organisers: reading the eulogy on stage, handling police liaison and legal risk off it.

2020年6月30日，《香港国安法》实施。2020年与2021年，警方两次以疫情为由禁止维园晚会——这是晚会举办三十一年来首次被禁。支联会成员仍以个人身份到维园献花、点烛，多人其后被控「煽动」或「参与未经批准集结」。何俊仁因2020年六四晚会一案认罪判刑（见下节）。一场悼念集会，从受《基本法》保障的和平集会，变成需要逐个追究的刑事案件链，前后不过两年。On June 30, 2020, the Hong Kong National Security Law took effect. In both 2020 and 2021 police banned the Victoria Park vigil citing COVID-19 — the first bans in thirty-one years. Alliance members still came individually with flowers and candles; many were later charged with 'incitement' or 'taking part in an unauthorised assembly.' Ho himself pleaded guilty and was jailed in the 2020 vigil case (below). Within two years, a memorial gathering protected by the Basic Law had become a chain of criminal cases.

三、2020—2021年：集结案判刑链3. 2020–2021: The Assembly Cases

2020年4月18日，警方一举拘捕何俊仁、黎智英、李柱铭等十五名民主派人士，指控他们在2019年8月至10月的多场游行中组织或参与「未经批准集结」。此后两年，何俊仁先后在四个案件中被判刑：2019年8月18日流水式集会案，判监十二个月、缓刑二十四个月；2019年10月1日游行案，判监十八个月；2019年10月20日游行案，判监十六个月；2020年六四烛光晚会案，他认罪后判监十个月。多个刑期同期执行，他于2021年5月起实际入狱服刑。On April 18, 2020, police arrested Ho together with fourteen other democrats, including Jimmy Lai and Martin Lee, over a series of 2019 marches, charging them with organising or joining 'unauthorised assemblies.' Over the following two years Ho was sentenced in four cases: twelve months suspended for twenty-four months for the August 18, 2019 rally; eighteen months for the October 1, 2019 march; sixteen months for the October 20, 2019 march; and, after a guilty plea, ten months for the June 4, 2020 vigil. With terms largely running concurrently, he entered prison in May 2021.

这些案件的共同点在于：被追诉的游行集会全部和平进行、无暴力事件，警方当年亦未即场拘捕；检控在《国安法》实施、政治气氛转变之后才集中到来。何俊仁在各案中或认罪或受审定罪，其律师生涯四十余年，最终以被告身份站在自己熟悉的法庭上——这一点，他在求情时亦曾自嘲提及。The cases shared a pattern: every march prosecuted had been peaceful, with no violence and no arrests made at the time; the prosecutions arrived in a batch only after the National Security Law changed the political weather. Across the cases Ho pleaded guilty or was convicted after trial. After forty years as a lawyer, he stood as a defendant in courts he knew well — a point he noted wryly in mitigation.

将四案合并计算：何俊仁因和平集会累计被判监禁名义刑期逾四年，实际因同期执行服刑约二十个月（含国安案还押期间的重叠）。2020年4月18日的大抓捕当日即引发国际关注：十五名被捕者包括82岁的民主党创党主席李柱铭，英国、美国与欧盟均发表声明关注检控的寒蝉效应。其后两年，同一批2019年游行的组织者被分案、分批审讯判刑，法律界普遍评论指出，「未经批准集结」罪在《公安条例》下最高刑期五年，检方对和平游行系统性地选择以此罪起诉资深民主派，实际效果是把2019年运动的领导层逐一送进监狱——何俊仁正是在这条流水线的中段，迎头撞上刑期更重的国安案。Taken together, the four cases gave Ho nominal sentences totalling over four years for peaceful assembly, of which, with terms running concurrently and overlapping his national-security remand, he served about twenty months. The mass arrest of April 18, 2020 drew immediate international attention: the fifteen arrested included the 82-year-old founding chairman of the Democratic Party, Martin Lee, and Britain, the United States and the EU all issued statements on the prosecutions' chilling effect. Over the next two years the organisers of the 2019 marches were tried and jailed case by case, batch by batch. Legal commentators widely noted that 'unauthorised assembly' under the Public Order Ordinance carries up to five years, and that systematically charging senior democrats with it for peaceful marches had the practical effect of sending the 2019 movement's leadership to prison one by one. Ho was midway down that conveyor when the far heavier national-security case reached him.

四、支联会国安案：从「外国代理人」指控到拘捕起诉4. The Alliance National Security Case: From 'Foreign Agent' Demand to Charges

2021年8月25日，警方国安处致函支联会多名常委，称支联会为「外国代理人」，援引《国安法》第43条实施细则，要求在限期内提交成员名单、会议记录、财务与活动资料。支联会公开回覆：支联会不是任何外国政府或政治组织的代理人，拒绝提交。9月7日，副主席邹幸彤等人将回覆信送交警察总部，表明不会交出资料。On August 25, 2021, the police National Security Department wrote to Alliance standing-committee members calling the Alliance a 'foreign agent' and demanding, under the National Security Law's Article 43 implementation rules, its membership lists, meeting records, finances and activity files by a deadline. The Alliance replied publicly: it was the agent of no foreign government or political organisation, and it would not comply. On September 7, vice-chair Chow Hang-tung and others delivered that refusal at police headquarters.

9月8日清晨，国安处拘捕邹幸彤、梁锦威、邓岳君、陈多伟四名支联会常委；9月9日，正在服刑的何俊仁与李卓人被正式落案，与邹幸彤及支联会本身同被控一项「煽动他人颠覆国家政权罪」，指控期间为2020年7月1日至2021年9月8日，案号其后编为高等法院HCCC 155/2022。同日，警方搜查位于旺角的六四纪念馆，检走展品与档案，并冻结支联会约220万港元资产。9月25日，支联会举行特别会员大会，通过解散决议——一个运作三十二年的组织在拘捕与冻结之间被迫落幕，其后从公司登记册中除名，法律程序由破产管理署署长代表处理。At dawn on September 8, national-security police arrested four Alliance committee members, including Chow Hang-tung. On September 9, Ho and Lee Cheuk-yan — both already in prison — were charged, with Chow and the Alliance itself, with one count of 'inciting others to subvert state power,' covering July 1, 2020 to September 8, 2021; the case became High Court HCCC 155/2022. The same day police raided the June Fourth Museum in Mong Kok, seizing exhibits and files, and froze some HK$2.2 million of Alliance assets. On September 25 an extraordinary general meeting voted to dissolve: after thirty-two years, the Alliance ended between arrests and an asset freeze, was later struck off the companies register, and was represented in the proceedings by the Official Receiver.

另案方面，邹幸彤、邓岳君、徐汉光因拒交资料案被判囚四个半月，2025年3月6日终审法院一致裁定三人上诉得直、撤销定罪，指出控方须先证明支联会确属「外国代理人」，且控方以公众利益豁免权大篇幅遮盖证据的方式使被告无法获得公平审讯。终审胜诉时，支联会早已解散，煽动颠覆案仍在候审。In the parallel data-refusal case, Chow Hang-tung, Tang Ngok-kwan and Tsui Hon-kwong were jailed for four and a half months. On March 6, 2025, the Court of Final Appeal unanimously allowed their appeals and quashed the convictions, holding that the prosecution had to prove the Alliance actually was a 'foreign agent,' and that heavy redaction of evidence under public-interest immunity had denied the defendants a fair trial. By the time of that victory the Alliance no longer existed, and the subversion case was still awaiting trial.

五、保释拉锯：肺癌、严苛条件与一度获释5. The Bail Struggle: Lung Cancer, Strict Conditions, Brief Release

国安法案件的保释门槛由第42条设定：法官须有充足理由相信被告不会继续实施危害国家安全行为，才可批准保释。何俊仁与李卓人、邹幸彤的保释申请在裁判法院与高等法院屡次被拒。2022年7月，何俊仁的保释申请再被拒绝；同年8月，他以年届七十、患肺癌需持续治疗为由再向高等法院申请，法官杜丽冰批准保释，条件严苛：除高额保释金与人事担保外，还包括不得离港、交出旅游证件、遵守宵禁、不得接受传媒访问、不得发表被视为危害国安的言论、不得与指定人士接触等。他自2021年5月入狱以来，首次踏出监狱，前后已羁押逾十五个月。Bail under the National Security Law is governed by Article 42: a judge may grant it only with sufficient grounds to believe the accused will not continue acts endangering national security. Bail applications by Ho, Lee and Chow were refused repeatedly in the magistracy and the High Court. In July 2022 Ho's application was refused again; in August, citing his age of seventy and lung cancer requiring continuing treatment, he applied once more, and Judge Esther Toh granted bail on stringent conditions: substantial cash bail and sureties, no departure from Hong Kong, surrender of travel documents, a curfew, no media interviews, no statements deemed to endanger national security, and no contact with specified persons. It was his first time out of custody since May 2021 — more than fifteen months.

保释期间，何俊仁深居简出，专注治疗与案件准备。但这段有限的自由只维持了七个月。2023年3月，警方国安处指称他涉嫌在保释期间干扰证人、妨碍司法公正，违反了保释条件。On bail, Ho lived quietly, focused on treatment and his defence. The limited freedom lasted seven months. In March 2023 the National Security Department alleged that, while on bail, he had interfered with witnesses and perverted the course of justice, breaching his bail conditions.

六、2023年3月：再度被捕、撤销保释6. March 2023: Rearrested, Bail Revoked

2023年3月21日，国安处人员到何俊仁住所将他拘捕。据传媒引述警方消息，拘捕与他被指通过接触向支联会案相关证人施加影响有关；何俊仁一方未公开回应指控细节。3月22日，他被带上法庭，保释被撤销，即时还押。此时他71岁，肺癌治疗未完。3月28日，联合国人权事务高级专员办事处罕见地就个别人士案件公开发声，称对何俊仁在健康状况危殆下被重新收押「深表关注」，敦促当局释放他以便其继续接受紧急医疗。On March 21, 2023, National Security Department officers arrested Ho at his home. Media reports citing police sources said the arrest concerned alleged approaches influencing witnesses in the Alliance case; Ho's side did not publicly address the specifics. On March 22 he was brought to court, his bail was revoked, and he was remanded on the spot. He was seventy-one, his lung-cancer treatment unfinished. On March 28 the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights took the unusual step of commenting on an individual case, saying it was following his return to custody 'despite his critical health condition' with great concern and urging the authorities to release him so his urgent medical care could continue.

自此何俊仁再未获释。干扰证人的指称其后未见独立成案起诉的公开报道；其实际效果是：一位癌症病人以保释条件争议为由，被重新关押，直至三年半后的审讯与判刑。Ho was never released again. The witness-interference allegation was never, so far as public reports show, separately prosecuted; its practical effect was that a cancer patient was returned to prison over a bail-conditions dispute, and stayed there through trial and sentencing three and a half years later.

七、漫长的审前羁押与一拖再拖的审期7. Years on Remand and a Trial Twice Delayed

支联会案交付高等法院后，审讯日期一再推迟：原定2025年5月开审，先延至2025年11月11日，再延至2026年1月22日。至2025年底，三名被告已被羁押一千三百至一千五百天不等——李卓人、邹幸彤自2021年9月起从未获保释；何俊仁累计还押亦逾一千三百天。国际特赦组织香港海外分会在2025年12月世界人权日的联合声明中指出，这种长度的审前羁押是香港国安案件平均值的四倍以上，批评当局以长期未审先囚作为打压手段，违反无罪推定。审讯一再延期期间，何俊仁表示将改答认罪，与控方商讨同意案情——在被告席上坐了四年多之后，这位七十多岁的律师选择了认罪。Committed to the High Court, the Alliance trial was delayed again and again: listed for May 2025, put back to November 11, 2025, then to January 22, 2026. By late 2025 the three defendants had spent between roughly 1,300 and 1,500 days in custody — Lee and Chow never bailed since September 2021, Ho cumulatively remanded for over 1,300 days. A joint statement by Amnesty International's Hong Kong overseas section and other groups on Human Rights Day, December 10, 2025, noted that this pre-trial detention ran to more than four times the average in Hong Kong national-security cases, denouncing prolonged detention without conviction as a tool of suppression contrary to the presumption of innocence. During the delays, Ho indicated he would change his plea to guilty and negotiate agreed facts with the prosecution — after more than four years in the dock, the lawyer in his seventies chose to plead.

八、2026年：开审、认罪与判刑8. 2026: Trial, Guilty Plea, and Sentencing

2026年1月22日，支联会案在西九龙裁判法院（暂代高等法院原讼法庭）开审，由三名国安法指定法官李运腾、黎婉姬、陈仲衡审理，无陪审团。何俊仁在开审时正式认罪；李卓人、邹幸彤及支联会（由破产管理署代表）不认罪受审。审讯实际进行约二十四天，结案陈词于2026年5月完成。控方的核心论据是支联会五大纲领中的「结束一党专政」：在其看来，这一口号旨在推翻中国宪法确立的根本制度。On January 22, 2026, the Alliance trial opened at the West Kowloon Law Courts, sitting as the High Court's Court of First Instance, before three National Security Law designated judges — Alex Lee, Amanda Woodcock and Johnny Chan — with no jury. Ho pleaded guilty at the opening; Lee, Chow and the Alliance (represented by the Official Receiver) pleaded not guilty and stood trial. The trial ran about twenty-four days, with closing submissions completed in May 2026. The prosecution's core argument targeted one of the Alliance's five goals — 'end one-party dictatorship' — which it cast as aiming to overthrow the fundamental system established by China's constitution.

2026年8月21日，法庭裁定李卓人、邹幸彤及支联会罪名成立；何俊仁因认罪早前已被裁定罪成。判词认定「结束一党专政」指向结束中国共产党在宪法下的领导地位，「结束」带有推翻、破坏之意，在国安法生效后继续推动该纲领可构成「其他非法手段」；同时判词亦确认，本案不涉及暴力或威胁使用暴力，被告亦未提出过实现该纲领的具体方法或时间表。9月11日判刑：何俊仁因认罪获扣减，判监五年两个月；李卓人七年；邹幸彤七年三个月；支联会罚款一百五十万港元。法庭量刑时指出案发时社会动荡、被告活动持续十四个月、接触面广，属「情节严重」级别。74岁的何俊仁是三人中刑期最短者。On August 21, 2026, the court convicted Lee, Chow and the Alliance; Ho stood convicted on his plea. The judgment held that 'end one-party dictatorship' meant ending the CCP's leadership as established under China's constitution, that 'end' carried the sense of overthrow and destruction, and that continuing to promote the goal after the National Security Law took effect could amount to 'other unlawful means.' The judgment also recorded that the case involved no violence or threat of violence, and that the defendants had put forward no concrete method or timetable for achieving the goal. Sentencing followed on September 11: Ho, with credit for his guilty plea, received five years and two months; Lee seven years; Chow seven years and three months; the Alliance was fined HK$1.5 million. The court placed the case in the 'serious nature' band, citing the unsettled social climate, fourteen months of activity and the defendants' wide reach. At seventy-four, Ho received the shortest term of the three.

九、家属、健康与执业资格的余波9. Family, Health, and Professional Fallout

何俊仁的家人多年来极为低调。妻子邓淑仪鲜有公开露面，子女从不就案件发声；何俊仁的健康状况——肺癌病史、保释期间的治疗、还押后的医疗安排——只有零星的法庭与传媒报道，家属从未召开记者会。这种沉默本身是香港国安案件的常态：家属接受访问即可能招来国安处的注视。Ho's family has kept a very low profile for years. His wife, Tang Suk-yee, rarely appears in public; his children have never spoken on the case. His health — the lung-cancer history, treatment while on bail, medical arrangements on remand — is known only through scattered court and media reports; the family has never held a press conference. That silence is itself typical of Hong Kong national-security cases: relatives who speak to media risk drawing the National Security Department's attention.

执业资格方面，2025年11月，何俊仁因定罪被暂停国际公证人资格七年。一个执业四十余年、曾为无数当事人辩护的律师，在职业生涯的终点被逐项摘除专业身份——太平绅士、公证人、议员、政党主席、支联会职务——判刑只是这条清除线的最后一环。Professionally, in November 2025 Ho's notary public licence was suspended for seven years following his convictions. A lawyer who had practised for more than four decades and defended countless clients saw his professional identities stripped one by one at the end of his career — Justice of the Peace, notary, legislator, party chairman, Alliance office-holder. The prison sentence was only the last link in that chain of removal.

十、国际反应10. International Response

何俊仁案的国际关注集中在三个时点。其一是2023年3月撤销保释：联合国人权高专办公开敦促释放（见上节），多家人权组织批评以健康危殆的癌症病人为还押对象。其二是审前羁押的拖延：国际特赦组织2025年发表题为「政府可以囚禁人，却无法禁锢他们的思想」的国安法五周年报告，将支联会案列为以程序拖延实施惩罚的样本，并与法律及公民社会组织联署要求立即释放三人。其三是2026年9月判刑：联合国人权高专办批评判刑「令人遗憾」，人权高专呼吁撤销定罪并将《国安法》修订至符合中国国际人权义务的水平；欧洲议会以459票对12票通过决议谴责判刑，并呼吁制裁行政长官李家超。香港监察（Hong Kong Watch）在其2026年9月人权简报中将本案判刑列为当月首要事件。International attention to Ho's case clustered at three moments. First, the March 2023 bail revocation, when the UN Human Rights Office publicly urged his release and rights groups condemned the re-imprisonment of a critically ill cancer patient. Second, the dragging pre-trial detention: Amnesty International's 2025 fifth-anniversary report on the National Security Law, 'The Government Can Imprison People, But It Cannot Imprison Their Thoughts,' used the Alliance case as an exemplar of punishment by procedural delay, and Amnesty joined legal and civil-society groups in demanding the three be freed. Third, the September 2026 sentencing: the UN Human Rights Office called the sentences 'regrettable,' its High Commissioner urging that the convictions be quashed and the National Security Law brought into line with China's international human rights obligations; the European Parliament condemned the sentences by 459 votes to 12 and called for sanctions on Chief Executive John Lee. Hong Kong Watch led its September 2026 human-rights briefing with the case.

十一、六四纪念馆：从尖沙咀到被查抄11. The June Fourth Museum: From Tsim Sha Tsui to the Raid

支联会对记忆的保存不止于一夜烛光。2014年，支联会在尖沙咀购置物业，开设全球首家六四纪念馆，展出六四文物、照片与文献；2016年，大厦业主立案法团以物业用途争议施压，纪念馆被迫关闭。2019年，纪念馆在旺角重新开馆。何俊仁作为支联会正、副主席，是纪念馆从创馆、闭馆到重开全程的决策者之一。2021年9月9日国安处搜查纪念馆时，警员检走展板、展品与档案，连馆内一尊民主女神像复制品亦在查抄之列；纪念馆自此再未开放。一个纪念馆的展品被当作「煽动颠覆」的证据搬走，与法庭上的口号定罪互为表里：被审查的不是行为，是记忆的载体。The Alliance preserved memory in more than one night of candles. In 2014 it bought premises in Tsim Sha Tsui and opened the world's first June Fourth Museum, displaying artefacts, photographs and documents; in 2016, under pressure from the building's owners' corporation over use of the premises, the museum was forced to close. It reopened in Mong Kok in 2019. As Alliance chairman and vice-chair, Ho was among the decision-makers through founding, closure and reopening. When national-security police raided the museum on September 9, 2021, officers carried away display boards, exhibits and archives — a replica Goddess of Democracy statue among them — and the museum has never reopened. Exhibits removed as evidence of 'inciting subversion' and a slogan convicted in court are two faces of one policy: what is being policed is not conduct, but the vessels of memory.

中国维权律师关注组是理解何俊仁的另一条线。关注组于2007年成立，何俊仁长期任主席，为内地「709」律师、为高智晟、李和平等人权律师的案件组织国际声援、发布报告、安排海外律师观察。在北京眼中，这条跨境声援网络正是支联会被指为「外国代理人」的背景之一——尽管关注组与支联会是两个独立组织，尽管声援律师从来不是秘密。2021年支联会覆灭的同时，关注组亦告解散。何俊仁四十年职业生涯的两条主线——香港议会政治与跨境人权声援——在同一年被同时切断。The China Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group is the other thread of Ho's career. Founded in 2007 and long chaired by Ho, it organised international support for mainland lawyers — the '709' detainees, Gao Zhisheng, Li Heping and others — publishing reports and arranging overseas legal observers. In Beijing's eyes this cross-border support network formed part of the background to the 'foreign agent' label pinned on the Alliance — although the two were separate organisations, and although supporting lawyers was never secret. The Concern Group dissolved in 2021 alongside the Alliance. Both threads of Ho's forty-year career — Hong Kong parliamentary politics and cross-border human-rights advocacy — were cut in the same year.

十二、执行机构档案12. The Institutions on Record

何俊仁案涉及的执行机构逐项如下：拘捕与调查为香港警务处国家安全处——包括2020年4月的大抓捕、2021年8—9月对支联会的资料要求、拘捕与查抄、2023年3月的再拘捕；检控由律政司刑事检控科承担，国安案件的检控决定依《国安法》须经律政司司长批准；审判法院依次为裁判法院（保释与交付程序）、区域法院（2021年集结案）与高等法院原讼法庭（支联会案，由行政长官指定的三名国安法法官审理、无陪审团）；羁押与服刑由惩教署执行。资产冻结由警务处处长依《国安法》第43条实施细则发出冻结通知。何俊仁的公证人资格暂停则由香港律师会及公证人管理机构依定罪纪录处理。每一环都有具体的机构与文书——这正是本案作为档案的意义：它不是抽象的「打压」，而是一连串可追溯的行政与司法决定。The institutions that acted in Ho's case, item by item: arrests and investigation by the National Security Department of the Hong Kong Police Force — the April 2020 mass arrests, the August–September 2021 data demand, arrests and raids against the Alliance, and the March 2023 rearrest. Prosecution by the Department of Justice's Prosecutions Division, national-security prosecutions requiring the Secretary for Justice's consent under the National Security Law. Courts in sequence: the Magistrates' Courts (bail and committal), the District Court (the 2021 assembly cases) and the High Court's Court of First Instance (the Alliance case, before three Chief-Executive-designated national-security judges, without a jury). Custody and imprisonment by the Correctional Services Department. The asset freeze was imposed by the Commissioner of Police under the Article 43 implementation rules. The suspension of Ho's notary licence followed from his conviction record through the Law Society and notarial authorities. Every link has a named institution and a paper trail — which is what makes this case an archive rather than an abstraction: not 'repression' in general, but a traceable series of administrative and judicial decisions.

十三、判刑之日：求情与庭外反应13. Sentencing Day: Mitigation and Reaction

判刑当日，何俊仁的求情理据集中于三点：年事已高（74岁）、肺癌病史与持续的健康风险、以及数十年公共服务纪录——议员、区议员、太平绅士、无偿的法律与人权工作。法庭接纳认罪扣减，但强调案情在「情节严重」级别，公共服务背景不足以抵销。9月11日宣判时，法庭内旁听席上有支持者与前支联会成员，何俊仁神情严肃，李卓人、邹幸彤则向旁听席微笑致意。宣判后，支联会前成员刘家仪等人在庭外表示刑期过重、定罪不公；家属未公开回应。三人中只有何俊仁未被传媒报道提出上诉——对认罪的被告而言，刑期上诉须证明量刑明显过重，门槛极高。At sentencing, Ho's mitigation rested on three points: his age of seventy-four; his lung-cancer history and continuing health risks; and decades of public service — legislator, district councillor, Justice of the Peace, and unpaid legal and human-rights work. The court accepted the guilty-plea discount but stressed the case's 'serious nature' band, against which a public-service record weighed little. On September 11, supporters and former Alliance members filled the public gallery; Ho appeared grave, while Lee and Chow smiled towards the gallery. After sentencing, former Alliance member Lau Ka-yee and others outside court called the terms excessive and the convictions unjust; the families made no public response. Of the three, Ho alone was not reported to have appealed — for a defendant who pleaded guilty, a sentence appeal must show the term was manifestly excessive, a very high threshold.

十四、现状（截至2026年10月）11. Current Status (as of October 2026)

何俊仁目前在狱中服刑，刑期五年两个月，自2026年9月11日宣判起计，此前累计一千三百余天的还押期依法折抵；其确切获释日期未见官方公布。李卓人、邹幸彤已就定罪与刑期提出上诉；何俊仁因认罪，其可上诉空间主要在刑期，截至2026年10月未见他提出上诉的公开报道。他曾担任主席的民主党，已于2025年启动解散程序；他担任副主席的支联会，解散已五年。他参与创办并悼念了三十年的维园烛光晚会，自2020年起不复存在。Albert Ho is serving his sentence of five years and two months, imposed on September 11, 2026, with his cumulative 1,300-plus days on remand credited by law; no official release date has been published. Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung have appealed their convictions and sentences. Ho, having pleaded guilty, could appeal mainly against sentence; as of October 2026 no appeal by him has been publicly reported. The Democratic Party he once chaired began dissolution procedures in 2025; the Alliance he served as vice-chair has been gone for five years; and the Victoria Park vigil he helped organise for thirty years has not been held since 2019.

本站点评Our Take

何俊仁案的定罪核心，是一句喊了三十年的口号。法庭自己确认：本案没有暴力，没有威胁使用暴力，没有实现纲领的具体方法或时间表。仅凭「结束一党专政」六个字与十四个月的公开活动，一位74岁、患肺癌的律师被判五年两个月——此前他已为此被关押一千三百多天，其中包括以从未被独立起诉的「干扰证人」指称为由撤销保释的三年半。把和平年代公开合法运作三十二年的团体追溯性地定性为犯罪，把悼念定性为颠覆的前奏，这不是在适用法律，而是在用法律追认一个政治结论：记忆本身有罪。At the core of Albert Ho's conviction is a slogan shouted openly for thirty years. The court itself recorded that this case involved no violence, no threat of violence, and no concrete method or timetable for achieving the Alliance's goal. On six words — 'end one-party dictatorship' — and fourteen months of public activity, a 74-year-old lawyer with lung cancer received five years and two months, after more than 1,300 days already spent in custody, including three and a half years following a bail revocation based on a witness-interference allegation that was never separately prosecuted. To reclassify, retroactively, an organisation that operated openly and lawfully for thirty-two years as a crime, and commemoration as the prelude to subversion, is not the application of law. It is law used to ratify a political conclusion: that memory itself is guilty.