第二十七案 | 地下天主教会:苏志民主教失踪案Case 27 | Underground Catholic Church: The Disappearance of Bishop Su Zhimin
1997年10月8日之后,再没有人见过这位主教。No one has seen this bishop since October 8, 1997.
事件经过What Happened
什么是"地下教会"?1957年,中共建立了"中国天主教爱国会",要求天主教徒加入这个不承认教宗权威的官方组织。拒绝加入、坚持效忠罗马教宗的教会,就成了"地下教会"。苏志民从1950年代起就拒绝加入爱国会,为此付出的代价是几十年的监禁(来源:USCIRF宗教良心犯数据库;龚品梅枢机基金会1997-10-11新闻稿)。他1932年出生,1981年祝圣为神父,1990年代初祝圣为主教,1995年就任保定教区正权主教——出生日期、祝圣年份在各来源中说法不一,本页取最保守的表述(来源:英文维基引Catholic-Hierarchy;中文维基引AsiaNews;具体日期未核)。
在1997年之前,他已经被捕过七次。1956年、1957年、1975年三次被捕,都是因为坚持信仰,其中1957年那次坐监五年后被送去农场劳改;1982年和1989年底,第四次、第五次被捕(来源:中文维基引AsiaNews)。1994年1月,他在北京与美国众议员Christopher Smith秘密会面——Smith后来回忆,这位主教温柔、坚强、勇敢,有一种超乎理解的平安;会面几天后,苏志民第六次被捕,迫于美方压力才无条件释放(来源:龚品梅基金会1997-10-11新闻稿;chrissmith.house.gov)。1996年3月,他率教友赴河北东闾圣母朝圣地游行,途中第七次被捕,约一个月后逃脱,转入藏匿。藏匿的17个月里,他致函全国人大要求停止宗教迫害,还发布了牧函,龚品梅基金会在1996年8月12日公布了他的呼吁书(来源:USCIRF;龚品梅基金会新闻稿;哈德逊研究所报告引1996-06-15呼吁书)。
1997年10月8日中午,河北辛集市。公安抓捕了苏志民,把他押回保定公安局(来源:龚品梅基金会1997-10-11新闻稿;宗教新闻社RNS;USCIRF)。这是第八次被捕。此后近29年里,关于他的消息几乎为零。失踪前,他累计在监狱和劳改营里度过了约26年(来源:USCIRF);美国众院听证会的口径更重:"累计约40年,未经指控、未经审判"(来源:Tom Lantos人权委员会;chrissmith.house.gov)。两种口径都列在这里,读者自己判断。
唯一的一次"被发现",发生在2003年11月15日。那天,亲属在保定市中心医院偶然看到了他——他在做眼科手术,还在治心脏病,身边有约20名便衣警察看守,没有正式登记入院。亲属还没来得及多说什么,他就被警察转移了(来源:龚品梅基金会经WWRN转述;USCIRF)。一说日期是11月19日(来源:香港教区《被遗忘的牧者》报告经NCR转述),标「未核」。这是1997年之后人们唯一一次确切见到他。
国际社会没有忘记他。美国国务院2003、2005、2013、2015年度的《国际宗教自由报告》中国章节,都提到了苏志民的失踪(来源:美国务院报告,refworld/ecoi.net收录文本)。2020年7月30日,美国众院Tom Lantos人权委员会举行专场听证会"Religious Freedom in China: The Case of Bishop James Su Zhimin",Smith议员当场质问习近平:苏主教在哪里?你们把这位上帝的仆人怎么样了?(来源:chrissmith.house.gov,内容转述)USCIRF为他建立了宗教良心犯数据库专页,2024和2025年度报告仍把他列为下落不明(来源:USCIRF;Catholic World Report 2025-09-30)。民间组织向联合国宗教自由特别报告员提交的呈件也收录了他的案子(来源:OHCHR文件)。英国上议院的David Alton勋爵2020年7月专文呼吁关注(来源:davidalton.net)。2018年中梵临时协议签署,之后两次续签——每一次,都没有带来苏主教的消息,这引发了广泛批评(来源:Bitter Winter 2022;NCR 2024)。他的侄子苏天佑2020年说,梵蒂冈应该牵头谈判,要求释放苏主教(来源:davidalton.net引UCA News)。
中方的说法呢?对美方多次询问,中方否认对苏志民采取"任何强制措施",说他只是在"旅行传教"(来源:美国务院2003、2005年度报告引中方回应)。2015年,河北教友联名向习近平请愿要求释放,当局回复"不知道主教下落"(来源:Catholic World Report 2016)。2000年,时任总主教McCarrick向USCIRF转述"苏主教已加入爱国会并获释"——多方指这是中共散布的虚假信息(来源:NCR 2024-07-10)。2020年前后,中方要求梵蒂冈承认他的助理安树新(已加入爱国会)接替他当保定主教,被地下教会视为"叛徒"(来源:UCA News经Christian Post 2020转述;Christianity Daily 2020)。
1996年那封呼吁书值得多说两句。藏匿中的苏志民致函全国人大,要求停止宗教迫害,还发布了牧函。龚品梅基金会在1996年8月12日公布了这份呼吁书(来源:龚品梅基金会新闻稿;哈德逊研究所报告引1996-06-15呼吁书原文)。一个被通缉、东躲西藏的主教,还在给全国人大写信讲道理——这种"以卵击石"的坚持,就是他后来29年下落不明的原因。他不是不知道代价,1994年和Smith会面后几天就被抓了,他什么都知道。
2015年那次请愿,是河北教友们的一次集体行动。他们联名向习近平请愿,要求释放苏主教。当局的回复是"不知道主教下落"(来源:Catholic World Report 2016)。一个被国家机器带走18年的人,官方说"不知道下落"——这句话本身就是证据:要么是谎言,要么是承认国家机器可以让一个人凭空消失。家属还得到过一个非正式说法:"还活着,如果梵中关系改善可以释放"(来源:Bitter Winter 2022单篇引述,未核)。这个说法没法证实,但它揭示了一种可能:主教的自由,被当成了外交筹码。
中梵临时协议是理解本案的钥匙。2018年9月22日,梵蒂冈和中国签署了关于主教任命的临时协议,之后在2020、2022、2024年三次续签。协议全文从未公开。梵蒂冈的逻辑是:先建立对话,再谈改善;批评者的逻辑是:协议签了,人还在失踪,说明对话没有换来任何实质让步(来源:Bitter Winter 2022;NCR 2024)。苏志民案就卡在这个死结里:2018年之后,每一次续签都没有带来他的消息。2020年,中方甚至要求梵蒂冈承认安树新接替他——等于让梵蒂冈亲手埋葬一个失踪的主教(来源:UCA News经Christian Post 2020转述)。
苏志民不是孤例。据报道,中国约35位地下主教,"每一位都处于监禁、失踪、软禁或监视之中"(来源:Independent Catholic News 2007)。易县的石恩祥主教2001年被捕,官方2015年称其在狱中死亡,但没有交还遗体(未核);温州的邵祝敏主教,梵蒂冈新闻办公室2017年曾正式声明呼吁释放他,2024年1月2日他再被带走;宣化的崔泰主教2021年4月后再失踪;新乡的张维柱主教2021年5月被捕至今下落不明(来源:Bitter Winter 2025;publicdispatch.org附录)。这是一整个群体的遭遇,苏志民只是其中失踪时间最长的一个。
2020年7月30日那场听证会,名字就叫"Where is Bishop Su?"。Smith议员说,他1994年在北京见过苏主教——在一间小公寓里,主教为他们做了弥撒,然后告诉代表团,他为迫害者祈祷,特别为"残忍而误入歧途的中共领导层"祈祷(来源:chrissmith.house.gov,内容转述)。几天后,主教就被抓了,关了9天。一个为迫害自己的人祈祷的人,被迫害了40年,然后消失了29年。这就是苏志民案的全部,也是地下天主教会在中国的缩影。
2020年7月30日那场听证会的证人名单,说明了本案的分量:USCIRF委员Nury Turkel、宗教自由研究所所长Tom Farr、哈德逊研究所宗教自由中心主任Nina Shea(来源:Religion Unplugged 2020-07-30)。Turkel在作证时说,对苏主教可能已在狱中去世的报道"深感悲痛"。一个维吾尔人权活动家,为一个天主教主教作证——迫害是不分宗教的,声援也是。听证会的官方页面上,至今还嵌着那段视频(来源:chrissmith.house.gov)。
香港教区2015年也为苏主教发过声,陈日君枢机曾带领请愿游行(来源:NCR)。但2018年中梵协议之后,香港教区的声音越来越难发出来。USCIRF 2025年度报告仍然把苏志民列为下落不明(来源:Catholic World Report 2025-09-30引)。哈德逊研究所2024年的《Ten Persecuted Catholic Bishops in China》报告,把他列在首位——失踪时间最长(来源:hudson.org)。近29年,一个主教从65岁失踪到94岁(如果还活着)。时间本身,就是刑期。
1994年1月那次秘密会面,地点是北京一间小公寓。Smith带着代表团去,主教为他们做了弥撒。Smith后来回忆,主教告诉他们,他为迫害者祈祷,特别为"残忍而误入歧途的中共领导层"祈祷(来源:chrissmith.house.gov,内容转述)。代表团还没离开中国,主教就被抓了,关了9天。为迫害者祈祷的人,被迫害者抓走——这就是1994年的中国。
2003年11月15日医院那次"被发现",有很多蹊跷:约20名便衣看守,没有正式登记入院,亲属刚看到就被转移(来源:龚品梅基金会经WWRN转述;USCIRF)。这说明两件事:第一,他还活着,至少2003年还活着;第二,他处于严密的秘密羁押中,连住院都要化名、不登记。从那以后,再也没有人见过他。22年了。
中方说他只是在"旅行传教"(来源:美国务院报告引中方回应)。一个"旅行传教"的人,需要20个便衣日夜看守?需要住院不登记?需要29年不跟家人联系?官方的每一句解释,都反过来证明了事情的严重性。2015年河北教友请愿,当局说"不知道下落"——从"旅行传教"到"不知道下落",官方的说法自己都对不上。
2016年之后,多次传出他去世的消息,但从未得到证实,标「未核」(来源:UCA News 2020)。截至2026年10月,他仍然下落不明——如果还活着,已经94岁。他是全球在任主教中被强迫失踪时间最长的已知案例。顺带一提:正定教区的贾治国主教,同样是地下教会长期被带走、软禁的受难者,已于2025年10月29日病逝,享年90岁(一说91岁)(来源:Agenzia Fides;catholicnewsworld 2025-11)。据报道,中国约35位地下主教,"每一位都处于监禁、失踪、软禁或监视之中"(来源:Independent Catholic News 2007)。苏志民是其中失踪最久的一个——截至目前无公开进展。
把时钟拨回苏志民之前。他的前任、保定教区主教范学淹(1907年生),1951年祝圣为主教,1958年因拒绝加入爱国会、坚持效忠教宗被判刑十年,出狱后继续劳改至1976年,1977年至1980年再度被捕。1981年,正是范学淹秘密祝圣苏志民为神父。1992年4月13日,范学淹在当局控制下去世。苏志民1988年出任保定教区辅理主教,1993年5月2日由刘冠东主教祝圣为主教,1995年就任保定教区正权主教(来源:中文维基百科引AsiaNews;英文维基百科引Catholic-Hierarchy;祝圣与就任的具体日期各源不一,本页注记在案)。保定教区是河北天主教的重镇,教友约10万人(来源:中文维基百科保定教区条目)。河北一省的地下教会信徒规模,在全国居前——这也是保定地下教会几十年被反复整肃的背景。
苏志民的助理主教安树新,走的是另一条路。安树新1996年与苏志民同期被当局带走,软禁约十年,2006年获释后加入爱国会。2010年8月7日,安树新就任官方承认的保定教区主教(来源:中文维基百科保定教区历任主教表;Christianity Daily经UCA News转述的地下教友批评)。地下教友称他为"叛徒",拒绝承认——同一个教区,两位主教:一位失踪,一位被官方扶起。2020年前后中方要求梵蒂冈承认安树新"接替"苏志民,等于要求罗马为一个失踪者提前写下讣告,梵蒂冈没有接受。
制度层面,逼迫从未停留在个案。2018年2月1日,修订后的《宗教事务条例》施行,未登记的宗教活动场所和未经官方认可的神职人员都面临行政处罚;2021年施行的《宗教教职人员管理办法》明文要求宗教教职人员"支持中国共产党的领导"。地下神父要合法讲道,先要登记、加入爱国会体系——这正是苏志民从1950年代起拒绝了四十年的事。拒绝的代价,本页已经写明:八次被捕,累计约26至40年监禁与劳改,最后是无限期的失踪。2004年8月,河北当局还曾一次抓捕10名地下教会神职人员(来源:Catholic Culture 2004-08-17报道)——苏志民失踪之后,抓捕从未停止,只是名字换了一批又一批。
2024年10月22日,中梵临时协议第三次续签,这次一签四年。梵蒂冈方面表示协议只涉及主教任命、不涉及外交关系(来源:梵蒂冈新闻及多家媒体报道)。续签消息里,依然没有苏志民。他的家属从未获准探视,甚至从未被告知他关在哪里、是死是活。侄子苏天佑多年对外发声,要求梵蒂冈在谈判中把释放苏主教列为条件。一个家庭等一个人,等了近29年,等到的只有沉默。
把视野放宽到全国,苏志民的遭遇是一整代地下主教的共同剧本。1950年代初,中共推动"三自革新",要求天主教会割断与罗马的一切联系;1955年,上海教区主教龚品梅因拒绝服从被捕,1960年以"反革命"罪名判无期徒刑——龚品梅枢机基金会正是为纪念他而设,本案多个关键细节也靠该基金会保存。1957年爱国会成立后,拒绝加入的主教、神父、教友成批入狱。河北是重灾区,也是抵抗最持久的地区:易县石恩祥、宣化崔泰、温州邵祝敏(浙江)、新乡张维柱,名字不同,路径相同——拒绝登记,就在监狱、软禁和失踪之间轮换。
近年的个案把这条线一直拉到今天。宣化教区崔泰主教2007年起反复被带走关押,2021年4月之后再次失踪,至今没有确切消息;新乡教区张维柱主教2021年5月20日与10名神父、修生一同被捕,神父修生后陆续获释,张维柱本人下落不明至今;温州教区邵祝敏主教2016年以来至少七次被带走"旅游"或拘留,梵蒂冈新闻办公室2017年为他专门发表声明,2024年1月2日他再次被带走(来源:Bitter Winter系列报道;UCA News;梵蒂冈新闻办公室2017年声明)。这些主教有一个共同点:都是梵蒂冈任命、北京不承认的"地下"主教,他们的教区在官方地图上由别人"接管",本人则在法律上不存在。
东闾朝圣地是另一个观察窗口。保定教区东闾村的中华圣母堂是全国著名朝圣地,每年五月圣母月,大批教友前往朝圣。苏志民1996年正是在率众赴东闾朝圣途中被捕。此后多年,东闾朝圣多次被当局以"维稳"为由封路、限流或变相禁止,教友只能分散前往(来源:UCA News、寒冬历年报道)。一个延续百年的民间朝圣传统,需要年年与封路令和检查站周旋——这就是"宗教中国化"落到地面上的样子:不是拆堂的消息上头条,而是每一次朝圣、每一台弥撒、每一个神父的任命,都要先过权力这一关。
苏志民案还暴露了中国法律的一个结构性空白:中国至今没有签署《保护所有人免遭强迫失踪国际公约》,刑法里也没有"强迫失踪"这个罪名。一个人被公安公开带走,家属却没有任何法律程序可以启动——不能报失踪,因为带走他的就是公安;不能请律师会见,因为官方否认羁押存在;不能申请信息公开,得到的回复是"不知道下落"。苏天佑等家属29年里能做的,只剩下请愿、接受外媒采访、在听证会上被别人提起。2015年河北教友联名请愿得到的"不知道下落",不是某个官员的推诿,而是这套制度的标准输出:当国家决定让一个人消失,法律没有给家属留下任何一扇门。
海外没有停止纪念。龚品梅枢机基金会多年来持续发布苏志民案的资料与呼吁;美国国会及行政当局中国委员会(CECC)的年度报告与政治犯数据库长期收录他的名字;2020年听证会之后,Smith议员办公室仍在追踪此案。保定本地教友则以自己的方式纪念:东闾朝圣、为失踪主教的祈祷,从未间断,只是越来越低调。截至2026年10月,苏志民失踪29年,是全球已知在任天主教主教中强迫失踪时间最长的个案——这一纪录每延长一天,都是对"宗教自由"四个字的一次实测。
1996年那封呼吁书的内容,今天读来仍然具体。据哈德逊研究所报告引述,藏匿中的苏志民在呼吁书中要求当局落实宪法规定的宗教信仰自由、停止对地下教会的迫害、释放被关押的宗教人员,并允许教会按自身的传统运作(来源:哈德逊研究所报告引1996-06-15呼吁书)。没有一句涉及政治颠覆,通篇是"请按你们自己的宪法办"——而写信的人为此付出的代价,是此后29年的失踪。这封信后来成了多家人权组织报告的引文,也是2003年之后国际社会追问此案时最常引用的文本。
What is the "underground Church"? In 1957, the CCP established the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, requiring Catholics to join an official body that denies the Pope's authority. Churches that refused and stayed loyal to Rome became the "underground Church." Su Zhimin refused to join the Patriotic Association from the 1950s onward, and paid for it with decades of imprisonment. (Sources: USCIRF religious-prisoners-of-conscience database; Cardinal Kung Foundation press release, October 11, 1997) Born in 1932, ordained a priest in 1981, consecrated a bishop in the early 1990s, and installed as Bishop of Baoding in 1995 — sources disagree on the exact dates of his birth and consecration, so this page uses the most conservative wording. (Sources: English Wikipedia citing Catholic-Hierarchy; Chinese Wikipedia citing AsiaNews; precise dates unverified)
Before 1997, he had already been arrested seven times. Three arrests in 1956, 1957 and 1975, all for holding to his faith — the 1957 one followed by five years in prison and then farm labor; a fourth and fifth arrest in 1982 and late 1989. (Source: Chinese Wikipedia citing AsiaNews) In January 1994, he met secretly in Beijing with U.S. Congressman Christopher Smith — who later recalled a bishop of gentleness, strength and courage, "a peace that surpassed all understanding"; days after the meeting, Su was arrested for the sixth time, released unconditionally only under U.S. pressure. (Sources: Cardinal Kung Foundation press release, October 11, 1997; chrissmith.house.gov) In March 1996, leading faithful on pilgrimage to the Marian shrine at Donglu, Hebei, he was arrested a seventh time, escaped about a month later and went into hiding. During 17 months in hiding he wrote to the National People's Congress demanding an end to religious persecution and issued a pastoral letter; the Kung Foundation published his appeal on August 12, 1996. (Sources: USCIRF; Kung Foundation press release; Hudson Institute report citing the June 15, 1996 appeal)
October 8, 1997. Midday. Xinji city, Hebei. Public security seized Su Zhimin and took him back to the Baoding public security bureau. (Sources: Cardinal Kung Foundation press release, October 11, 1997; Religious News Service; USCIRF) It was his eighth arrest. In the nearly 29 years since, word of him has been close to zero. Before disappearing, he had spent about 26 years in prisons and labor camps. (Source: USCIRF) The U.S. House hearing's formulation is starker: "approximately 40 years, without charge, without trial." (Sources: Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission; chrissmith.house.gov) Both formulations are given here; readers may judge.
The single "sighting" came on November 15, 2003. That day, relatives spotted him by chance at Baoding Central Hospital — undergoing eye surgery and heart treatment, watched by about 20 plainclothes police, never formally registered as a patient. Before the relatives could say much, police moved him away. (Sources: Cardinal Kung Foundation via WWRN; USCIRF) One account gives November 19 (source: the Hong Kong diocese's The Forgotten Shepherd via NCR) — marked unverified. It remains the only confirmed sighting of him since 1997.
The world has not forgotten him. The U.S. State Department's 2003, 2005, 2013 and 2015 International Religious Freedom Reports all mention Su Zhimin's disappearance in their China chapters. (Source: State Department reports, texts via refworld/ecoi.net) On July 30, 2020, the House Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a dedicated hearing, "Religious Freedom in China: The Case of Bishop James Su Zhimin," at which Congressman Smith demanded of Xi Jinping: where is Bishop Su — what have you done to this servant of God? (Source: chrissmith.house.gov; paraphrased) USCIRF maintains a dedicated prisoner-of-conscience page for him and still lists him as missing in its 2024 and 2025 annual reports. (Sources: USCIRF; Catholic World Report, September 30, 2025) Civil-society submissions to the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief include his case. (Source: OHCHR document) Britain's Lord David Alton devoted a July 2020 essay to his plight. (Source: davidalton.net) The 2018 provisional Vatican–China agreement, renewed twice since — each time bringing no word of Bishop Su, drawing wide criticism. (Sources: Bitter Winter, 2022; NCR, 2024) His nephew Su Tianyou said in 2020 that the Vatican should lead negotiations demanding his release. (Source: davidalton.net citing UCA News)
And Beijing's account? To repeated U.S. inquiries, China denied taking "any coercive measures" against Su Zhimin, saying he was merely "traveling as a missionary." (Source: via the State Department's 2003 and 2005 reports) In 2015, when Hebei faithful petitioned Xi Jinping for his release, authorities replied they "did not know the bishop's whereabouts." (Catholic World Report, 2016) In 2000, then-Archbishop McCarrick relayed to USCIRF that "Bishop Su had joined the Patriotic Association and been released" — widely identified as CCP disinformation. (Source: NCR, July 10, 2024) Around 2020, Beijing pressed the Vatican to recognize his assistant An Shuxin (who had joined the Patriotic Association) as Bishop of Baoding in his place — the underground church calls An a "traitor." (Sources: UCA News via Christian Post, 2020; Christianity Daily, 2020)
The 1996 appeal deserves a closer look. In hiding, Su Zhimin wrote to the National People's Congress demanding an end to religious persecution, and issued a pastoral letter. The Kung Foundation published the appeal on August 12, 1996. (Sources: Kung Foundation press release; Hudson Institute report citing the June 15, 1996 original) A wanted bishop, hiding from place to place, still writing reasoned letters to the National People's Congress — that quixotic persistence is why he has been missing for 29 years. He knew the cost; days after meeting Smith in 1994 he was arrested. He knew everything.
The 2015 petition was a collective act by Hebei's faithful. They jointly petitioned Xi Jinping for Bishop Su's release. The authorities replied they "did not know the bishop's whereabouts." (Catholic World Report, 2016) A man taken away by the state apparatus 18 years earlier, and the official line is "whereabouts unknown" — the sentence is itself evidence: either a lie, or an admission that the state machine can make a person vanish into thin air. The family also received an informal word: "still alive; could be released if Vatican–China relations improve." (Source: a single Bitter Winter 2022 article — unverified) Unverifiable, but it reveals a possibility: the bishop's freedom treated as a diplomatic chip.
The provisional Vatican–China agreement is the key to this case. On September 22, 2018, the Vatican and China signed the provisional agreement on bishop appointments, renewed in 2020, 2022 and 2024. The full text has never been published. The Vatican's logic: build dialogue first, improvements later; the critics' logic: the agreement is signed, the man is still missing, so dialogue bought no substantive concession. (Sources: Bitter Winter, 2022; NCR, 2024) The Su Zhimin case is stuck in that knot: after 2018, no renewal brought any word of him. In 2020, Beijing even pressed the Vatican to recognize An Shuxin as his replacement — asking the Vatican to bury a disappeared bishop with its own hands. (Source: UCA News via Christian Post, 2020)
Su Zhimin is not an isolated case. China has about 35 underground bishops, reportedly "every one of them in prison, disappeared, under house arrest or under surveillance." (Source: Independent Catholic News, 2007) Bishop Shi Enxiang of Yixian was arrested in 2001; officials said in 2015 he had died in prison, but never returned the body (unverified); Bishop Shao Zhumin of Wenzhou — for whom the Vatican press office issued a formal call for release in 2017 — was taken away again on January 2, 2024; Bishop Cui Tai of Xuanhua disappeared again after April 2021; Bishop Zhang Weizhu of Xinxiang was arrested in May 2021 and remains missing. (Sources: Bitter Winter, 2025; publicdispatch.org appendix) This is a whole community's ordeal; Su Zhimin is simply the one missing the longest.
The July 30, 2020 hearing was titled "Where is Bishop Su?" Congressman Smith said he had met Bishop Su in Beijing in 1994 — in a tiny apartment, the bishop celebrated Mass for the delegation, then told them he prayed for his persecutors, especially for the "cruel and misguided leadership of the Chinese Communist Party." (Source: chrissmith.house.gov; paraphrased) Days later the bishop was arrested and held for nine days. A man who prayed for those who persecuted him was persecuted for 40 years, then vanished for 29. That is the whole of the Su Zhimin case — and the underground Catholic Church in China in miniature.
The witness list at the July 30, 2020 hearing shows the case's weight: USCIRF Commissioner Nury Turkel, Religious Freedom Institute president Tom Farr, Hudson Institute Center for Religious Freedom director Nina Shea. (Source: Religion Unplugged, July 30, 2020) Turkel testified to being "saddened" by reports that Bishop Su might have died in custody. A Uyghur human rights advocate testifying for a Catholic bishop — persecution doesn't discriminate by religion, and neither does solidarity. The hearing's official page still carries the video. (Source: chrissmith.house.gov)
Hong Kong's diocese also spoke up for Bishop Su in 2015; Cardinal Joseph Zen led a petition march. (Source: NCR) But after the 2018 Vatican–China agreement, voices from Hong Kong's diocese grew harder to raise. USCIRF's 2025 annual report still lists Su Zhimin as missing. (Source: via Catholic World Report, September 30, 2025) The Hudson Institute's 2024 Ten Persecuted Catholic Bishops in China puts him first — missing the longest. (Source: hudson.org) Nearly 29 years: a bishop who disappeared at 65 would be 94 now, if still alive. Time itself is the sentence.
The January 1994 secret meeting took place in a small Beijing apartment. Smith's delegation came; the bishop celebrated Mass for them. Smith later recalled the bishop telling them he prayed for his persecutors, especially for the "cruel and misguided leadership of the Chinese Communist Party." (Source: chrissmith.house.gov; paraphrased) Before the delegation had even left China, the bishop was arrested and held for nine days. A man who prayed for his persecutors, seized by the persecutors — that was China in 1994.
The November 15, 2003 hospital "sighting" was full of tells: about 20 plainclothes guards, no formal admission record, the relatives barely glimpsed him before he was moved away. (Sources: Kung Foundation via WWRN; USCIRF) It proved two things: first, he was alive — at least in 2003; second, he was under tight secret detention, hospitalized under a false name with no registration. No one has seen him since. Twenty-two years.
Beijing says he is merely "traveling as a missionary." (Source: via the State Department report) A "traveling missionary" who needs 20 plainclothes guards day and night? Who must be hospitalized without registration? Who goes 29 years without contacting family? Every official explanation proves the opposite of what it claims. When Hebei faithful petitioned in 2015, authorities said they "did not know his whereabouts" — from "traveling as a missionary" to "whereabouts unknown," the official story can't even agree with itself.
Since 2016, reports of his death have surfaced repeatedly, never confirmed — marked unverified. (Source: UCA News, 2020) As of October 2026, he remains missing — 94 years old if still alive. He is the longest-known case of enforced disappearance among sitting Catholic bishops worldwide. A footnote: Bishop Jia Zhiguo of Zhengding, another underground prelate repeatedly seized and held under house arrest, died of illness on October 29, 2025, at 90 (some sources say 91). (Sources: Agenzia Fides; catholicnewsworld, November 2025) China has about 35 underground bishops, reportedly "every one of them in prison, disappeared, under house arrest or under surveillance." (Source: Independent Catholic News, 2007) Su Zhimin has been missing the longest — no public developments to report.
Wind the clock back to the man before Su Zhimin. His predecessor as Bishop of Baoding, Peter Joseph Fan Xueyan (born 1907), was consecrated bishop in 1951, sentenced to ten years in 1958 for refusing to join the Patriotic Association and insisting on loyalty to the Pope, then sent to labor reform until 1976 after his release, and arrested again from 1977 to 1980. It was Fan Xueyan who secretly ordained Su Zhimin a priest in 1981. Fan died under the authorities' control on April 13, 1992. Su Zhimin became auxiliary bishop of Baoding in 1988, was consecrated a bishop by Bishop Peter Liu Guandong on May 2, 1993, and took office as Bishop of Baoding in 1995. (Sources: Chinese Wikipedia citing AsiaNews; English Wikipedia citing Catholic-Hierarchy; the exact dates of consecration and installation differ across sources and are flagged on this page) The Baoding diocese is a stronghold of Hebei Catholicism with roughly 100,000 faithful. (Source: Chinese Wikipedia, Baoding diocese entry) Hebei's underground church is among the largest in China — the backdrop to decades of repeated crackdowns on Baoding's underground community.
Su Zhimin's auxiliary bishop, An Shuxin, took the other road. An was taken away by the authorities in 1996, the same period as Su, held under house arrest for about ten years, and after his release in 2006 joined the Patriotic Association. On August 7, 2010, An Shuxin was installed as the officially recognized Bishop of Baoding. (Sources: Chinese Wikipedia's list of Baoding bishops; underground faithful's criticism via UCA News in Christianity Daily) Underground Catholics call him a "traitor" and refuse to recognize him — one diocese, two bishops: one disappeared, one installed by the state. Around 2020, Beijing pressed the Vatican to recognize An as Su's "replacement" — in effect asking Rome to write an obituary in advance for a disappeared man. The Vatican did not accept.
At the institutional level, the pressure was never confined to individual cases. On February 1, 2018, the revised Regulations on Religious Affairs took effect, exposing unregistered religious venues and clergy not recognized by the state to administrative penalties; the Measures for the Management of Religious Clergy, effective 2021, expressly require religious clergy to "support the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party." For an underground priest to preach legally, he must first register and join the Patriotic Association system — the very thing Su Zhimin refused for forty years from the 1950s on. The price of refusal is on this page: eight arrests, some 26 to 40 cumulative years in prison and labor camps, and finally an open-ended disappearance. In August 2004, Hebei authorities seized ten underground clergy at once. (Source: Catholic Culture, August 17, 2004) After Su Zhimin vanished, the arrests never stopped; only the names changed, batch after batch.
On October 22, 2024, the provisional Vatican–China agreement was renewed a third time, this time for four years. The Vatican stated the agreement concerns only bishop appointments, not diplomatic relations. (Sources: Vatican News and multiple media reports) Once again, the renewal brought no word of Su Zhimin. His family has never been allowed to visit him, never even been told where he is held or whether he is alive. His nephew Su Tianyou has spoken out for years, urging the Vatican to make the bishop's release a condition in negotiations. A family has waited nearly 29 years for one man; all it has received is silence.
Zoom out to the whole country, and Su Zhimin's fate is the shared script of a generation of underground bishops. In the early 1950s the CCP pushed the "Three-Self" movement, demanding the Catholic Church sever all ties with Rome; in 1955, Shanghai's Bishop Ignatius Kung Pin-mei was arrested for refusing to comply and in 1960 was sentenced to life imprisonment as a "counterrevolutionary" — the Cardinal Kung Foundation, which preserves many key details of this case, was founded in his memory. After the Patriotic Association was established in 1957, bishops, priests and faithful who refused to join were imprisoned in batches. Hebei was both a disaster zone and the region of most durable resistance: Shi Enxiang of Yixian, Cui Tai of Xuanhua, Shao Zhumin of Wenzhou (Zhejiang), Zhang Weizhu of Xinxiang — different names, the same path: refuse to register, and rotate between prison, house arrest and disappearance.
Recent cases run this line into the present. Bishop Cui Tai of Xuanhua was repeatedly seized and detained from 2007, disappeared again after April 2021, and has not been reliably heard of since. Bishop Zhang Weizhu of Xinxiang was arrested on May 20, 2021 together with ten priests and seminarians; the priests and seminarians were gradually released, but Zhang Weizhu himself remains missing. Bishop Shao Zhumin of Wenzhou has been taken away for "tours" or detention at least seven times since 2016; the Vatican press office issued a statement specifically for him in 2017, and he was seized again on January 2, 2024. (Sources: Bitter Winter reports; UCA News; Vatican press office statement, 2017) These bishops share one trait: appointed by the Vatican and unrecognized by Beijing, their dioceses are "taken over" by others on official maps while they themselves do not exist in law.
The Donglu pilgrimage shrine is another window. The Our Lady of China church in Donglu village, Baoding diocese, is a nationally known pilgrimage site; every May, the Marian month, crowds of faithful make the pilgrimage. It was on a pilgrimage to Donglu in 1996 that Su Zhimin was arrested. In the years since, the Donglu pilgrimage has repeatedly been road-blocked, capped or effectively banned by the authorities in the name of "stability," with the faithful forced to come in scattered groups. (Sources: UCA News; Bitter Winter, various years) A century-old popular pilgrimage tradition must negotiate roadblocks and checkpoints every year — this is what the "Sinicization of religion" looks like on the ground: not headline church demolitions, but every pilgrimage, every Mass and every priestly appointment having to pass the gate of power first.
The Su Zhimin case also exposes a structural blank in Chinese law: China has never signed the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, and its criminal code contains no offense of "enforced disappearance." A man is taken away openly by public security, yet his family can start no legal process at all — they cannot file a missing-person report, because it was the police who took him; they cannot arrange a lawyer's visit, because the authorities deny the detention exists; they cannot obtain information, because the official reply is "whereabouts unknown." In 29 years, all Su Tianyou and the family could do was petition, speak to foreign media, and be mentioned at other people's hearings. The "whereabouts unknown" that Hebei's faithful received in reply to their 2015 petition was not one official's evasion but the system's standard output: when the state decides to disappear a person, the law leaves the family no door at all.
Commemoration abroad has not stopped. The Cardinal Kung Foundation has continued for years to publish materials and appeals on the Su Zhimin case; the U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China's annual reports and political-prisoner database have long carried his name; after the 2020 hearing, Congressman Smith's office continued to track the case. Baoding's local faithful commemorate in their own way — Donglu pilgrimages and prayers for the disappeared bishop have never ceased, only grown quieter. As of October 2026, Su Zhimin has been missing for 29 years, the longest known case of enforced disappearance of a sitting Catholic bishop in the world — and every day this record lengthens is a field test of the words "religious freedom."
The content of that 1996 appeal still reads concretely today. As quoted in the Hudson Institute's report, Su Zhimin — then in hiding — asked the authorities to implement the religious freedom guaranteed in the constitution, stop persecuting the underground church, release imprisoned religious personnel, and allow the Church to operate according to its own traditions. (Source: Hudson Institute report, citing the June 15, 1996 appeal) Not a line of it touched on political subversion; the whole letter says, in effect, "act according to your own constitution" — and the price its author paid was 29 years of disappearance. The letter later became a standard citation in human-rights reports and the text most often invoked when the world asks about this case.
时间线Timeline
- 1956 / 1957 / 1975 — 三次被捕(坚持信仰),1957年一次坐监五年后送农场劳改(中文维基引AsiaNews)。
- 1981年 — 祝圣为神父(英文维基引Catholic-Hierarchy)。
- 1982 / 1989年底 — 第四、五次被捕(中文维基引AsiaNews)。
- 1994年1月 — 与美国众议员Christopher Smith在北京秘密会面;数日后第六次被捕,后迫于美方压力无条件释放(龚品梅基金会1997-10-11新闻稿;chrissmith.house.gov)。
- 1995年 — 就任保定教区正权主教(具体日期未核)。
- 1996年3月 — 率教友赴东闾朝圣途中第七次被捕;约一月后逃脱,转入藏匿(USCIRF)。
- 1996年6–8月 — 藏匿中致函全国人大、发布牧函,呼吁停止宗教迫害(龚品梅基金会新闻稿;哈德逊研究所报告)。
- 1997年10月8日(中午) — 在河北辛集被公安重新抓捕(第八次),押回保定;此后下落不明(龚品梅基金会1997-10-11新闻稿;RNS;USCIRF)。
- 2003年11月15日 — 保定市中心医院被亲属偶然发现(眼科+心脏病治疗,便衣看守),随即被转移;一说11月19日(未核)(龚品梅基金会经WWRN转述;USCIRF)。
- 2015年 — 河北教友向习近平请愿要求释放;当局称"不知道主教下落"(Catholic World Report 2016)。
- 2018 / 2020 / 2022 / 2024年 — 中梵临时协议签署及续签,均无苏主教消息(Bitter Winter;NCR)。
- 2020年7月30日 — 美众院Tom Lantos人权委员会听证会"Where is Bishop Su?";去世传言未证实(chrissmith.house.gov;UCA News)。
- 2024–2026年 — 哈德逊研究所《Ten Persecuted Catholic Bishops in China》、USCIRF年度报告仍列其"下落不明"。
- 2025年10月29日 — 正定教区贾治国主教病逝(Agenzia Fides;catholicnewsworld)。
- 1951年 / 1992年4月13日 — 前任保定主教范学淹祝圣(1951年)及去世(1992年);苏志民1981年由范学淹秘密祝圣为神父(中文维基引AsiaNews)。
- 2010年8月7日 — 安树新就任官方承认的保定教区主教,地下教会拒绝承认(中文维基保定教区条目)。
- 2018年2月1日 / 2021年 — 修订《宗教事务条例》及《宗教教职人员管理办法》相继施行,未登记者面临处罚(公开法规文本)。
- 2024年10月22日 — 中梵临时协议第三次续签(四年期),仍无苏主教消息(梵蒂冈新闻)。
- 2021年5月20日 — 新乡教区张维柱主教与10名神父、修生同日被捕,张维柱此后下落不明(Bitter Winter;UCA News)。
- 2024年1月2日 — 温州教区邵祝敏主教再次被带走,此前多年至少七次被带走拘留(Bitter Winter)。
- 1956 / 1957 / 1975 — Three arrests for holding to his faith; the 1957 one followed by five years in prison and farm labor (Chinese Wikipedia citing AsiaNews).
- 1981 — Ordained a priest (English Wikipedia citing Catholic-Hierarchy).
- 1982 / late 1989 — Fourth and fifth arrests (Chinese Wikipedia citing AsiaNews).
- January 1994 — Secret Beijing meeting with U.S. Congressman Christopher Smith; arrested a sixth time days later, released unconditionally under U.S. pressure (Kung Foundation press release, Oct 11, 1997; chrissmith.house.gov).
- 1995 — Installed as Bishop of Baoding (exact date unverified).
- March 1996 — Seventh arrest en route to the Donglu pilgrimage; escapes about a month later and goes into hiding (USCIRF).
- June–August 1996 — Writes to the National People's Congress and issues a pastoral letter from hiding, calling for an end to religious persecution (Kung Foundation press release; Hudson Institute report).
- October 8, 1997 (midday) — Re-arrested (eighth time) in Xinji, Hebei, taken back to Baoding; missing ever since (Kung Foundation press release, Oct 11, 1997; RNS; USCIRF).
- November 15, 2003 — Spotted by chance by relatives at Baoding Central Hospital (eye surgery + heart treatment, plainclothes guards), then moved away; one account says Nov 19 (unverified) (Kung Foundation via WWRN; USCIRF).
- 2015 — Hebei faithful petition Xi Jinping for his release; authorities say they "do not know the bishop's whereabouts" (Catholic World Report, 2016).
- 2018 / 2020 / 2022 / 2024 — Provisional Vatican–China agreement signed and renewed; no word of Bishop Su (Bitter Winter; NCR).
- July 30, 2020 — House Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission hearing, "Where is Bishop Su?"; death rumors unconfirmed (chrissmith.house.gov; UCA News).
- 2024–2026 — Hudson Institute's Ten Persecuted Catholic Bishops in China and USCIRF annual reports still list him as missing.
- October 29, 2025 — Bishop Jia Zhiguo of Zhengding dies of illness (Agenzia Fides; catholicnewsworld).
- 1951 / April 13, 1992 — Su's predecessor Fan Xueyan is consecrated bishop (1951) and dies (1992); Su is secretly ordained a priest by Fan in 1981 (Chinese Wikipedia citing AsiaNews).
- August 7, 2010 — An Shuxin is installed as the officially recognized Bishop of Baoding; the underground church refuses to recognize him (Chinese Wikipedia, Baoding diocese).
- February 1, 2018 / 2021 — The revised Regulations on Religious Affairs and then the Measures for the Management of Religious Clergy take effect; the unregistered face penalties (public regulatory texts).
- October 22, 2024 — The provisional Vatican–China agreement is renewed a third time (four-year term); still no word of Bishop Su (Vatican News).
视频证据Video Evidence
以下视频开篇即讲述苏志民主教27年失踪案(独立评论频道,来源性质特此说明)。The following video opens with Bishop Su Zhimin's 27-year disappearance (independent commentary channel — noted for source transparency).
▲ Father Samuel:"China Made 10 Catholic Bishops Disappear — and the Vatican Looked Away"(独立频道,引用哈德逊研究所2024年报告)▲ Father Samuel: "China Made 10 Catholic Bishops Disappear — and the Vatican Looked Away" (independent channel; cites the Hudson Institute's 2024 report)
本站点评Our Take
苏志民案的核心不是信仰之争,而是一条简单的界线:教会的人事由谁决定。中共的答案是国家——1957年设立爱国会,要求神职人员先效忠政权、再效忠信仰;拒绝登记者,先是监狱和劳改营,最后是无限期的失踪。一个主教不经审判、不见家属、连关押地点都不存在于任何官方记录里,近29年只剩一句"旅行传教"和一句"不知道下落"。这不是宗教管理,而是把一个人从法律世界里彻底删除。当登记与否决定一个人是否存在时,所谓宗教自由,只剩登记表上的一行字。At the core of the Su Zhimin case is not a dispute over faith but a simple line: who decides the Church's own personnel. The CCP's answer is the state — the Patriotic Association set up in 1957 requires clergy to pledge loyalty to the regime before loyalty to faith; those who refuse to register get prison and labor camps first, and finally open-ended disappearance. A bishop held without trial, without family visits, whose place of detention appears in no official record, reduced over nearly 29 years to two official phrases — "traveling as a missionary" and "whereabouts unknown." This is not religious administration; it is the deletion of a person from the legal world. When registration decides whether a person exists, religious freedom is reduced to a line on a registration form.
来源Sources
- USCIRF 宗教良心犯数据库:苏志民专页
- 龚品梅枢机基金会:1997-10-11新闻稿(10月8日辛集被捕)
- 美众院:2020-07-30听证会"Where is Bishop Su?"官方页面
- Bitter Winter:苏志民八次被捕全史(2022)
- National Catholic Register:2003年医院发现、2015年请愿(2024)
- Catholic World Report:2015年向习近平请愿、当局称不知下落(2016)
- Christian Post:2020年去世传言、安树新接替争议
- 联合国宗教自由特别报告员:民间呈件(收录苏志民案,PDF)
- Catholic News World:贾治国主教2025-10-29病逝
- 相关视频(YouTube):https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-5Ma9KT-3URelated video (YouTube)