EndCCPWorld.com

Wenzhou is called "China's Jerusalem." The trading city in southeastern Zhejiang has one of the country's largest Christian populations and densest concentrations of churches; many of their crosses stood atop rooftops, visible from far away. Starting in February 2014, those crosses began falling one after another. The official line was "Three Rectifications and One Demolition" — renovating old residential areas, old factory zones and urban villages, plus tearing down illegal structures. Church crosses were "too conspicuous," "too tall," and fell within the campaign's scope. ChinaAid reported that then-Zhejiang party secretary Xia Baolong, after touring Wenzhou, deemed crosses like Sanjiang Church's "too conspicuous" and launched the province-wide operation — a single-source claim, marked here as unverified. (Sources: ChinaAid; worldwatchmonitor.org) The provincial religious affairs chief Feng Zhili publicly said Christianity's growth was "too excessive and too haphazard." (Source: via Global Voices)

The first domino was Sanjiang Church in Yongjia county, Wenzhou. The church cost 20 to 30 million yuan, had been completed in December 2013, seated 2,000 people, covered more than 100,000 square feet — and was a government-registered, legal church. (Sources: English Wikipedia, "Sanjiang Church," citing multiple foreign outlets; ChinaAid; CSW) Officials called it an illegal structure, structurally unsafe. On April 3, authorities issued a notice to demolish the entire complex; on April 7, the two sides briefly reached a deal to remove only two floors of an annex; but on April 28 the bulldozers rolled in and the whole church was flattened. Before the demolition, thousands of believers had camped inside overnight, trying to shield it with their bodies. (Same sources) Sanjiang's fall made one thing clear to everyone: even registered churches weren't safe.

Over the next two years, the crosses fell faster and faster. How many exactly? Tallies differ by methodology and cutoff date; this page lists the main figures side by side. Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) counted more than 400 related incidents in Zhejiang within a year as of April 2015; the Associated Press reported about 400 crosses removed as of May 2015; The Guardian put it at 1,200 as of August 2015; The New York Times gave a range of 1,200–1,700 in May 2015; Amnesty International said more than 1,500 in March 2016, a figure also used in the U.S. State Department's 2015 International Religious Freedom Report; Bitter Winter reported more than 1,700; ChinaAid-affiliated tallies run highest at 1,800 to over 2,000 — but with no independent audit, marked here as unverified. (Sources: CSW; AP via Christian Post/Christianity Today; The Guardian; The New York Times; Amnesty International; U.S. State Department 2015 IRF Report; Bitter Winter; ChinaAid) The most widely cited range is 1,200 to 1,700.

The removals were rarely peaceful. At 3 a.m. on July 21, 2014, believers at the Salvation Church in Shuitou town, Pingyang county, Wenzhou, had been keeping overnight vigils for a month. That day, a roughly 600-strong contingent — including special police — forcibly removed the cross; about 50 believers were injured, and 78-year-old Zhang Zhongsu was beaten until his head split open and he collapsed gravely wounded. (Sources: Bitter Winter's 2019 retrospective interview; The New York Times, 2016) Note: the 600-person figure, the 50 injuries, Zhang's grave injuries and the detail that the government later paid 13,000 yuan to "seal the matter" all come from a single Bitter Winter article — marked here as unverified. A week later, on July 28, the 10-foot red cross of Longgang's Gratitude Church was lifted off by crane while believers knelt around it weeping. (Sources: Christian Post; AP) On June 11, 2014, believers at the Baixiang Guantou church had successfully pushed back and blocked a crane — footage that later circulated overseas. (Sources: ICC; Global Voices)

In May 2015, the campaign entered its "institutional" phase. Zhejiang issued a 36-page draft code for religious buildings: crosses must hug exterior walls, may not stand on rooftops, and may be no taller than one-tenth of the exterior wall's height; Catholic crosses were assigned a 1:0.618 height-to-width ratio, Protestant ones 3:2. (Sources: AP/The New York Times via Christianity Today) Crosses went from "being torn down" to "not permitted to stand" — the physical phase wound down as control became routine.

Lawyers weren't spared either. Beijing lawyer Zhang Kai was seized on the evening of August 25, 2015, inside a Wenzhou church, along with two assistants — then held under residential surveillance at a designated location for about six months. On February 25, 2016, he appeared on Wenzhou television to "confess" to violating national law, disrupting social order and endangering national security; he was transferred to criminal detention on February 26 and released on bail on March 23, returning to Hohhot, Inner Mongolia. (Sources: Amnesty International Urgent Action 190/15 series; Reuters) Pastor Huang Yizi's ordeal twisted further: arrested August 3, 2014, for group prayer in front of the Salvation Church, sentenced March 24, 2015, to one year for "disturbing social order," released August 1 — then re-arrested on September 12, less than six weeks later, and has been out of contact since. (Source: UN Special Rapporteur communication to the Chinese government, AL China 11/2015)

The 25 days from notice to demolition at Sanjiang Church deserve a closer look. After the April 3 notice to demolish all buildings, believers kept day-and-night watch inside. On April 7, officials relented: a deal to remove only two floors of an annex — many thought it was over. But on April 28, large forces surrounded the church, bulldozers drove straight in, and the entire complex was flattened within a day. (Sources: English Wikipedia citing multiple foreign outlets; ChinaAid) The "deal first, demolish anyway" pattern recurred across Zhejiang's cross removals: negotiation was a delaying tactic; demolition was the predetermined goal.

The Wenling standoff was larger still. Believers at the Wenling church in Taizhou reportedly faced as many as 4,000 police trying to save two rooftop crosses; they failed, and one congregant said as many as 40 were detained in the confrontation. (Source: WWRN, citing residents) Longgang Gratitude Church's 10-foot red cross was cut down by crane and blowtorch on July 28, 2014 — unlike the fierce resistance of previous months, this time the congregation did not resist. A pastor from a nearby church said: "We didn't want to fight them, but what they did was clearly illegal." (Source: WWRN) From resistance to non-resistance wasn't surrender — it was a sober accounting of the cost.

In the summer of 2015, the campaign briefly "slowed." On August 10, 2015, The New York Times reported the cross removals might ease ahead of the September 3 military parade — Beijing had a set piece coming, so localities held back. (Source: NYT, August 10, 2015) But once the parade passed, lawyer Zhang Kai was seized on August 25. That same month, the cross of the Shanqian church in Beibaixiang, Yueqing, was forcibly removed and caught fire during the demolition; a crane hoisted the burning cross, charred black, and dumped it by the roadside. (Source: Radio Free Asia) Believers called it a humiliation of Christians.

Pastors Bao Guohua and Xing Wenxiang, a couple from Jinhua, were criminally detained on July 27, 2015, and paraded by the media in a "perp walk" — a Cultural Revolution-style practice unseen for decades. The Zhejiang Christian Council then suspended them from their church posts. (Source: Radio Free Asia) The official church system (the "Two Associations") plays an ambiguous role here: nominally representing Christians, in practice cooperating with official punishment of disobedient pastors. Three-Self churches lost their crosses all the same; Three-Self pastors were arrested all the same — "legal" status was no protection at all.

The campaign's tail is long. At around 4 a.m. on July 7, 2020, Yongjia county government personnel brought more than a hundred people to tear down the crosses of two churches in Yongfu village, Wenzhou; most of the demolition crew wore security-guard uniforms. (Source: Bitter Winter) In May 2026, Wenzhou's Yayang Church was reduced to rubble — its members had already been rounded up in the preceding months. (Source: Bitter Winter, 2026) A decade after the cross-removal campaign, the target has grown from crosses to entire churches. The campaign never truly ended; it just changed its name: the Sinicization of religion.

Feng Zhili's "too excessive and too haphazard" is a key to this campaign. The then-head of Zhejiang's religious affairs bureau publicly said Christianity's growth in the province was "too excessive and too haphazard." (Source: via Global Voices) "Too fast" — believers multiplying too fast; "too haphazard" — house churches beyond control. Crosses "too conspicuous," churches "too tall" — at bottom, too many Christians. "Three Rectifications and One Demolition" targeted "illegal structures"; what really had to go was the growth itself.

The Global Times once quoted a Wenzhou religious-affairs official saying church personnel "broadly supported" the removals. (Source: official claim as recorded) But meanwhile believers were keeping overnight vigils, raising crosses in the streets, petitioning Xi Jinping. A "broadly supported" campaign needs no special police at 3 a.m., no 600-strong demolition crews, no beating a 78-year-old until his head splits open. The official story and the reality on the ground don't match.

The May 2015 36-page draft code had another detail: it regulated not just crosses but the wholesale "Sinicization" of church architecture — upturned eaves, bracket sets, Chinese-style facades. (Sources: AP/NYT via Christianity Today) Crosses couldn't stand; churches had to look like temples. This was the rehearsal for the later "Sinicization of religion": first take down the crosses, then remake the churches "Chinese style," then Sinicize the sermons too. Zhejiang's crosses were step one.

Shuixin Church's story distills the campaign's endlessness. The century-old church's cross was first removed on June 30, 2014; believers later re-erected it; in the early hours of February 1, 2021, more than a hundred security guards raided and took it down again — the second time. (Sources: ICC; ChinaAid) By 2021, "Three Rectifications and One Demolition" was long over, yet cross removals continued. A local Christian said the government paid guards to remove crosses in 2014, detaining brothers and sisters during the removals; four years later they re-erected the cross, and now it's gone again. (Source: via ICC) Tear down, re-erect, tear down — a war of attrition.

New York Times reporter Ian Johnson traveled repeatedly to Zhejiang between 2014 and 2016; he wrote that Zhejiang's Christians saw the campaign as the central government's "pilot project" — if Wenzhou could be subdued, it could be replicated nationwide. (Source: NYT) The State Department's 2015 International Religious Freedom Report put the Zhejiang cross removals in its China chapter, recording more than 1,500 crosses removed. (Source: U.S. 2015 IRF Report) Foreign ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying responded that the report was "full of political bias" and that Chinese citizens fully enjoyed religious freedom by law. (Source: official response as recorded) Both accounts are on the table: one side counting the fallen crosses, the other insisting religious freedom is ample.

Believers' resistance never stopped. Overnight vigils were the most common form; in July 2015, Catholics and Protestants launched a "a cross in every hand" movement, carrying small crosses on their backs and in their hands; 20 Catholic leaders — including 89-year-old Bishop Zhu Weifang — staged a two-hour peaceful protest on Wenzhou's streets. (Sources: Christian Post; The Guardian) The authorities never issued any document formally ending the campaign. ChinaAid relayed that it lasted until 2016, but without an official original text — marked here as unverified. (Source: via ChinaAid) What happened in substance: after 2016, Zhejiang's religious control shifted to the internal remodeling of "Sinicization of religion," while sporadic demolitions continued — in February 2021, the cross of Wenzhou's Shuixin Church was removed for the second time. (Source: ICC) The crosses fell; the control stayed. As of October 2026, no public document has characterized the campaign or held anyone accountable — no public developments to report.

Two procedural details. First, the suspicions against Zhang Kai: Amnesty International's urgent action records that he was held under residential surveillance at a designated location on suspicion of "stealing, spying into, buying or illegally providing state secrets or intelligence for entities outside China" and "gathering a crowd to disrupt social order," and that his two assistants, Liu Peng and Fang Xiangui, were taken at the same time and released successively afterward (source: Amnesty International Urgent Action UA 190/15 series). For a lawyer advising churches, the first label applied was "state secrets." Second, collective pushback from believers: in July 2015, pastors and leaders of more than one hundred Zhejiang churches issued a joint open letter demanding an end to forced cross removals and accountability for violent demolitions (sources: CSW and ChinaAid reporting, 2015). The letter received no public response; a month later, Zhang Kai was seized in Wenzhou. The sequence — open letter, then arrest — itself shows the response the authorities chose.

The judicial chain of the Bao Guohua and Xing Wenxiang case stopped at "criminal detention" in the account above; it is completed here.

Xing Wenxiang's sentence was later reduced. In November 2025, after more than ten years in prison, she was released (sources: ChinaAid; Church in Chains). ChinaAid's follow-up reporting in May 2026 said that since her release she had lost her home, her ministry and her income, while carrying a huge court-imposed fine — "the challenges of returning to society have proven almost cruel" (source: ChinaAid, 2026). Bao Guohua remains in prison; on the original 14-year term, until 2029 (source: Church in Chains, as of 2026). A pastor couple and their son, three convictions in one household — the heaviest family toll of the cross-removal campaign.

Hangzhou's Gu Yuese is a parallel thread. Gu was president of the China Christian Council and senior pastor of Chongyi Church, one of the largest Three-Self churches in the country. In 2015 he had publicly voiced opposition to the cross removals. In January 2016 he was taken away for investigation on suspicion of economic offenses including misappropriation of funds, and the Zhejiang Christian "Two Associations" promptly announced his removal from office (sources: AFP, Gospel Herald and other 2016 reports). According to ChinaAid, Gu Yuese was released in December 2017, and the case never saw a public trial afterward (source: ChinaAid). From Wenzhou's house churches to the senior pastor of Hangzhou's flagship Three-Self church, the campaign struck both the official and unofficial systems.

The division of labor among the executing agencies deserves a note. Nominally under the "Three Rectifications and One Demolition" framework, the campaign's religious-site rectification drive was led by ethnic and religious affairs departments at each level, which designated "illegal structures" and issued rectification notices; comprehensive law-enforcement and local governments organized the demolition crews; public security handled order at the scene and dealt with resisters; and the propaganda system kept a single line (source: synthesized from public reporting on the Sanjiang and other cases; English Wikipedia, "Sanjiang Church"). Lawyer Zhang Kai's seizure and Pastor Huang Yizi's conviction ran through two further channels — public security's "residential surveillance at a designated location" and the courts' criminal process. Within one campaign, administrative demolition, criminal prosecution and televised confession were three tools used in parallel.

Two more notes on the international response. The U.S. State Department expressed concern over the Zhejiang cross removals in multiple public statements between 2014 and 2016, in addition to the 2015 International Religious Freedom Report cited above; after Bao Guohua and Xing Wenxiang were heavily sentenced in February 2016, The New York Times, AFP and The Guardian covered the verdicts prominently, and international religious-freedom organizations listed the case among that year's gravest (sources: NYT and AFP, February 2016; Church in Chains and CSW records). News of Xing Wenxiang's release in 2025 was likewise carried internationally by ChinaAid and Church in Chains — a decade on, this case is still being documented.

• Late 2013 / February 2014 — Campaign begins; church crosses removed under the "Three Rectifications and One Demolition" banner (Amnesty's 2016 urgent action dates it to late 2013; The New York Times to 2014).
• April 3, 2014 — Sanjiang Church receives notice to demolish all its buildings.
• April 7, 2014 — A deal is briefly reached to remove only two floors of an annex.
• April 28, 2014 — Sanjiang Church wholly demolished after thousands of believers camped overnight to protect it (English Wikipedia; ChinaAid; CSW).
• June 11, 2014 — Believers at Baixiang Guantou church push back a crane; footage leaks (ICC; Global Voices).
• June 2014 — Month-long overnight vigils begin at Shuitou Salvation Church; Shuixin Church's cross removed for the first time on June 30.
• July 21, 2014 — ~600-strong force removes Shuitou Salvation Church's cross at 3 a.m.; ~50 believers injured (single Bitter Winter source — unverified; The New York Times, 2016).
• July 28, 2014 — Longgang Gratitude Church's 10-foot red cross lifted off by crane as believers kneel weeping (Christian Post; AP).
• August 3, 2014 — Pastor Huang Yizi arrested after group prayer at the Salvation Church (UN Special Rapporteur communication).
• March 24, 2015 — Huang Yizi sentenced to one year for "disturbing social order."
• April 2015 — CSW counts 400+ related incidents in Zhejiang within a year.
• May 2015 — 36-page draft building code: crosses barred from rooftops (AP/NYT via Christianity Today).
• August 25, 2015 — Lawyer Zhang Kai seized inside a Wenzhou church (Amnesty; Reuters).
• January 2016 — Chongyi Church senior pastor Gu Yuese taken away for investigation and removed from office (AFP and other 2016 reports); released in December 2017 per ChinaAid.
• February 25, 2016 — Wucheng District Court, Jinhua: Bao Guohua 14 years, Xing Wenxiang 12 years, their son Bao Chenxing 3 years, 10 coworkers suspended (Zhejiang Daily via ChinaAid and the New York Times).
• February 25, 2016 — Zhang Kai "confesses" on Wenzhou television; criminal detention Feb 26; bail March 23.
• February 2021 — Shuixin Church's cross removed for the second time (ICC).
• November 2025 — Xing Wenxiang released after a sentence reduction, more than ten years served; Bao Guohua remains imprisoned (ChinaAid; Church in Chains).

This campaign almost never mentioned the word "faith." Crosses were "illegal structures," churches were "structurally unsafe," a pastor's charge was "disturbing social order," and the lawyer who defended believers "confessed" on television — every step wore the shell of administration and law. But the registered Sanjiang Church was flattened all the same, a signed agreement was voided all the same, and pre-dawn demolitions showed that procedure was notification, not constraint. When the label "illegal structure" can be pointed at any church, the law's function is not to mark the limits of power but to supply a vocabulary that can be invoked at will. More than a thousand crosses fell not because of any new law, but through the concentrated use of old tools.