EndCCPWorld.com

王全璋Wang Quanzhang

一、专接「没人敢接的案子」的律师1. A Lawyer Who Took the Cases Nobody Dared Touch

王全璋1976年2月15日生于山东省五莲县，2000年毕业于山东大学法学院，此后在济南、北京执业。他代理的案件构成一份敏感名单：法轮功学员案、房屋维权者倪玉兰案、记者齐崇淮案、新公民运动参与者案件、土地被征收的农民案件。2008年，他的住所曾被国家安全人员搜查。这些案件的共同点与高智晟案相同：当事人的对手是公权力，而王全璋的武器只有程序——要求会见、要求阅卷、要求开庭、当庭质证。在2000年代成长起来的维权律师群体中，他以不妥协著称：同行被劝退、被约谈时，他继续接案。2015年「709」大抓捕之前，他已经在当局的名单上；709之后，他成为这份名单上被关得最久的人。Wang Quanzhang was born on February 15, 1976, in Wulian County, Shandong, graduated from Shandong University Law School in 2000, and practiced in Jinan and Beijing. His caseload reads as a list of sensitivities: Falun Gong practitioners, housing activist Ni Yulan, journalist Qi Chonghuai, New Citizens' Movement participants, and farmers whose land was seized. State security officers raided his home in 2008. As in Gao Zhisheng's cases, his clients' opponent was state power, and Wang's only weapon was procedure — demanding meetings, file access, open hearings, and cross-examination. Among the rights lawyers who emerged in the 2000s he was known for not backing down: when colleagues were warned off, he kept taking cases. He was on the authorities' list before the "709" crackdown of 2015; afterward, he became the man on that list held the longest.

二、2013年靖江法院：为当事人辩护被拘留十日2. Jingjiang, 2013: Detained Ten Days for Defending a Client

2013年4月3日，王全璋在江苏省靖江市人民法院为一名法轮功学员辩护，庭审后被法官以「违反法庭秩序」为由决定司法拘留十日，关入靖江市拘留所。一名执业律师在履行辩护职责时被审理案件的法院直接关押，这在当时引发律师界的集体声援：多名律师赶往靖江要求会见，社交媒体上持续抗议。在压力下，靖江法院于4月6日提前将他释放。这件事是理解709的预演：当法院可以随手关押辩护人，法庭就不再是讲理的地方，而只是宣判的地方。两年后，王全璋面对的不再是十日拘留，而是三年多的与世隔绝。On April 3, 2013, after defending a Falun Gong practitioner at the Jingjiang People's Court in Jiangsu, Wang Quanzhang was ordered into ten days of judicial detention by the judge for allegedly disrupting court order, and held at the Jingjiang detention house. A practicing lawyer jailed by the very court before which he was defending a client drew a collective protest from the legal profession: lawyers travelled to Jingjiang demanding access, and the outcry continued online. Under pressure, the court released him early, on April 6. The episode was a rehearsal for 709: when a court can lock up defense counsel at will, the courtroom stops being a place where reasons are heard and becomes a place where verdicts are merely announced. Two years later, Wang faced not ten days but more than three years of total isolation.

三、2015年8月失联：指定居所监视居住3. August 2015: Disappearance Into "Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location"

2015年7月9日，「709」大抓捕从北京锋锐律师事务所开始，数日内蔓延全国，逾三百名律师、活动人士被抓捕、传唤或约谈（具体数字见本站709事件档案）。王全璋于2015年8月初失联，家属多方打听后才得知他被天津警方以「指定居所监视居住」秘密关押——地点不告知家属，不许会见律师，不许通信。2016年1月，他被天津市公安局以涉嫌「颠覆国家政权罪」正式逮捕。家属先后委托多名律师要求会见，全部被以「涉及国家安全」拒绝；其代理律师余文胜因持续要求会见、公开控告办案机关，2018年1月被吊销执业证并随即被抓捕。另一位律师程海统计，2015至2018年间，王全璋至少五名家属委托的律师被挡在门外。关押近三年半，他是709所有被抓者中唯一长期不许律师会见、不许家属探视的人——在法律文书上，这叫监视居住；在事实上，这就是强迫失踪。The "709" crackdown began on July 9, 2015, at Beijing's Fengrui Law Firm and spread nationwide within days; more than three hundred lawyers and activists were seized, summoned, or interrogated (see this site's 709 event file). Wang Quanzhang lost contact in early August 2015. His family eventually learned that Tianjin police held him under "residential surveillance at a designated location" — the location withheld from the family, with no lawyer meetings and no correspondence. In January 2016 the Tianjin Public Security Bureau formally arrested him on suspicion of "subversion of state power." Every lawyer the family retained was refused access on "state security" grounds; his counsel Yu Wensheng, who kept demanding access and publicly accused the handling agencies, had his license revoked in January 2018 and was himself detained. Lawyer Cheng Hai counted at least five family-appointed lawyers blocked between 2015 and 2018. For nearly three and a half years Wang was the only 709 detainee denied both lawyer and family access for so long. On paper it was residential surveillance; in fact it was enforced disappearance.

四、李文足：剃发、千里寻夫与最高法控告4. Li Wenzu: Shaved Heads, a 100-Kilometre Walk, and Petitions to the Supreme Court

王全璋失联时，他的妻子李文足29岁，儿子全全两岁。此后三年多，李文足成为中国最知名的寻夫者：她三十多次到最高人民法院递交控告材料，控告天津办案机关不许律师会见、超期羁押，每次都被堵在门外或被带离。2017年12月，她与李和平妻子王峭岭、谢燕益妻子原珊珊等人一起剃光头发抗议——「剃发」与「无法」同音，她们举着的牌子上写着「我们可以无发，你们不能无法」。2018年4月4日，王全璋失联第999天，李文足从北京出发，徒步前往关押地天津「千里寻夫」，计划行程约100公里；徒步第六天，她被天津国安人员带走遣返。2018年5月，德国总理默克尔访华期间专门会见了李文足与另一位709家属。她的抗争没有换回丈夫的自由，但换回了一样东西：全世界都知道王全璋还活着、还关着——这使办案机关无法让他无声无息地消失。When Wang vanished, his wife Li Wenzu was 29 and their son Quanquan was two. Over the next three years she became China's best-known searching wife: more than thirty times she took complaints to the Supreme People's Court accusing the Tianjin agencies of blocking lawyer access and overlong detention, and each time she was stopped at the gate or taken away. In December 2017 she and other 709 wives — Wang Qiaoling and Yuan Shanshan among them — shaved their heads in protest, exploiting a pun: "we can be without hair (fa), you cannot be without law (fa)." On April 4, 2018, the 999th day of her husband's disappearance, Li set out on foot from Beijing toward Tianjin, where he was held, on a roughly 100-kilometre "thousand-li search for her husband"; on the sixth day Tianjin state security seized and returned her. In May 2018, Chancellor Angela Merkel met Li and another 709 wife during her China visit. Her campaign did not free her husband, but it achieved something else: the whole world knew Wang Quanzhang was alive and in custody — which made it impossible for the handling agencies to disappear him in silence.

五、2018年12月26日秘密开庭，2019年1月28日判决5. A Secret Trial on December 26, 2018; Sentenced January 28, 2019

2018年12月26日——西方圣诞假期期间——天津市第二中级人民法院以「涉及国家秘密」为由，对王全璋案不公开开庭。开庭当天，李文足被国保堵在家中无法出门，据后来披露的消息，王全璋在庭上解聘了官方指派的律师。2019年1月28日，天津二中院在其网站发布简短通告：王全璋犯「颠覆国家政权罪」，判处有期徒刑四年六个月，剥夺政治权利五年。判决书全文至今从未公开，他是否上诉、二审如何处理，均无公开记录可查（本站核实至2026年10月，仍未见判决书文本）。从2015年8月失联到2019年1月宣判，三年半的时间里，这个案子没有一次公开开庭、没有一份公开文书、没有一次律师会见。宣判后，他被转入山东省临沂监狱服刑。On December 26, 2018 — during the Western Christmas holidays — Tianjin No. 2 Intermediate People's Court tried Wang Quanzhang behind closed doors on the ground that the case involved "state secrets." On the trial day, state security kept Li Wenzu confined at home; later reports said Wang dismissed his government-appointed lawyer at the hearing. On January 28, 2019, the court posted a brief notice on its website: Wang was convicted of "subversion of state power" and sentenced to four years and six months in prison, with five years' deprivation of political rights. The full judgment has never been published, and no public record establishes whether he appealed or how any appeal was handled (verified to October 2026: no judgment text is available). Between his disappearance in August 2015 and sentencing in January 2019 — three and a half years — the case produced not one public hearing, not one public document, and not one lawyer meeting. After sentencing he was transferred to Linyi Prison in Shandong to serve his term.

六、临沂监狱：四年来的第一次会见与儿子的退学6. Linyi Prison: A First Visit in Four Years, and a Son Driven From School

2019年6月，李文足带着儿子全全和王全璋的姐姐王全秀在临沂监狱第一次见到王全璋，会见三十分钟。这是家人近四年来第一次确认他还活着。李文足形容，会见中的丈夫反应迟钝、目光呆滞，像一个「被设定好程序的木头人」，与家人几乎没有交流——她据此公开担忧，长期的隔绝关押与传闻中的酷刑已严重损害他的精神状态。2019年12月的一次会见被监狱以冬奥会安保等理由推迟至节后，外界普遍认为推迟是为了避开国际媒体在圣诞期间的关注。株连落在孩子身上：2019年9月，警察多次到全全就读的小学施压，六岁的全全被迫退学。一个律师的案子，就这样从法庭延伸到他儿子的教室。In June 2019 Li Wenzu, with their son Quanquan and Wang's elder sister Wang Quanxiu, saw Wang Quanzhang at Linyi Prison for thirty minutes — the family's first confirmation in nearly four years that he was alive. Li described a husband who was slow to react, dull-eyed, like a programmed wooden man, barely interacting with his family; she said publicly that years of isolation and reported torture appeared to have seriously damaged his mental state. A December 2019 visit was postponed by the prison past the holidays, widely read as a move to avoid international media attention over Christmas. The punishment reached the child: in September 2019 police repeatedly visited Quanquan's primary school, and the six-year-old was forced to leave it. A lawyer's case thus extended from the courtroom into his son's classroom.

七、2020年4月5日刑满：济南「隔离」与迟到的团聚7. April 5, 2020: Released Into "Quarantine" in Jinan

2020年4月5日清晨，王全璋刑满释放。他没有回到北京的家，而是被直接送往其户籍地山东济南，以防疫为名「隔离」十四天——警方甚至要求他济南房产的租户搬走以便安置他。隔离期满、五次核酸检测均为阴性后，他仍被拦在济南不许回京，直到4月27日李文足突发急病，他才被允许返回北京与家人团聚——距他被带走已过去四年零八个月。欧盟在释放当日发表声明，欢迎他获释但要求其释放必须是无条件的，并要求调查他在关押期间遭受虐待与酷刑的报告。回京后，王全璋对媒体表示将依法申诉、挑战自己的定罪，称其审判违反刑事诉讼法、全程没有辩护律师；他的执业证早已被注销，「释放」之后，他连重操旧业的资格都没有。In the early morning of April 5, 2020, Wang Quanzhang was released at the end of his sentence. He was not taken home to Beijing but straight to Jinan, Shandong — his household-registration city — for fourteen days of "quarantine" against COVID-19; police even had the tenant of his Jinan flat move out to house him. After the quarantine ended and five nucleic-acid tests came back negative, he was still blocked from returning to Beijing, until April 27, when Li Wenzu suffered a medical emergency and he was finally allowed home — four years and eight months after he was taken. The European Union welcomed his release the same day, insisting it must be unconditional and calling for investigation of reports of his mistreatment and torture in custody. Back in Beijing, Wang told media he would petition to challenge his conviction, which he said violated the Criminal Procedure Law and proceeded without any defense counsel. His practicing license had long since been cancelled; "release" did not restore even his right to work in his own profession.

八、国际反应：联合国认定任意拘留8. International Response: The UN Finds Arbitrary Detention

2018年8月，联合国任意拘留问题工作组就王全璋案发表第62/2018号意见，认定对他的拘留属任意拘留，要求立即释放并给予赔偿——北京没有理会这份意见，半年后照常将他判刑。美国国务院多次在年度人权报告与公开声明中点名此案；国际律师协会人权研究所联合二十多家人权组织致函中国司法部，谴责对709律师的酷刑、关押与骚扰；一百多家全球公民社会组织联署公开信要求放人。国际特赦组织在判决当日称，对他的惩罚只因他和平地捍卫人权，要求立即无条件释放。人权观察等组织则指出他的个案的标本意义：一个国家可以先让一名律师消失三年半，再用一场一小时的秘密庭审把消失合法化。这些反应没能改变判决，但它们构成另一份档案——与天津二中院那纸从未公开的判决书相比，这份档案是公开的。In August 2018 the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention issued Opinion No. 62/2018 on Wang's case, finding his detention arbitrary and calling for his immediate release and compensation. Beijing ignored the opinion and sentenced him six months later anyway. The U.S. State Department named his case repeatedly in human-rights reports and public statements. The International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute, with more than twenty rights organizations, wrote to China's Justice Ministry condemning the torture, imprisonment, and harassment of the 709 lawyers; over one hundred global civil-society organizations signed an open letter demanding releases. Amnesty International said on sentencing day that he was being punished for peacefully defending human rights and must be released immediately and unconditionally. Human Rights Watch and others noted the specimen value of the case: a state can disappear a lawyer for three and a half years, then legalize the disappearance with a one-hour secret trial. These responses did not change the verdict, but they form a second archive — a public one, unlike Tianjin No. 2 Court's never-published judgment.

九、出狱之后：十三个住处与截至2026年的现状9. After Release: Thirteen Homes, and His Status as of 2026

出狱不是迫害的终点。2023年4月至6月，王全璋一家在北京被迫搬家十三次：每签下一处租约，房东很快就受到压力，租约即被解除。据自由亚洲电台报道，2023年6月，他们搬到昌平区一处住所后，门口长期有不明身份男子守候；6月19日，家中被断电，李文足当晚致电供电部门报修，供电站先承诺处理，随后又称物业表示属「内部问题」拒绝恢复。一家人长期处于监控之下，全全的教育安排一再被迫调整。截至2026年10月本页核实之日，王全璋与李文足仍居北京，他不时在社交媒体发声，公开报道中未见他再次被捕或被判刑的新消息；他的律师执业资格没有恢复，出境亦受限制——709律师群体普遍被边控，他本人的边控文书从未公开，本站只能记录到：自2020年获释至今，没有他获准离开中国的公开报道。Release was not the end of the persecution. Between April and June 2023, the family was forced to move thirteen times in Beijing: each time a lease was signed, the landlord came under pressure and the lease was cancelled. According to Radio Free Asia, after they moved to Changping District in June 2023, unidentified men kept watch at their door; on June 19 their power was cut, and when Li Wenzu called the power bureau that evening, the local station first promised to fix it, then said the property company called it an "internal matter" and refused reconnection. The family lives under long-term surveillance, and Quanquan's schooling has been disrupted again and again. As of this page's verification in October 2026, Wang Quanzhang and Li Wenzu remain in Beijing; he posts on social media from time to time, and no public reporting shows any new arrest or sentence. His license to practice has not been restored, and his exit from China is restricted — 709 lawyers are broadly subject to exit bans; his own ban document has never been made public, and this page can record only that, since his 2020 release, there is no public report of him being permitted to leave China.

十、申诉之路：判决书不存在，申诉无门10. The Appeal That Has Nowhere to Go

王全璋出狱后公开表示要挑战自己的定罪，但这条法律之路从第一步就走不通：他和家属至今没有拿到完整的判决书。天津二中院2019年1月28日的通告只有罪名与刑期两项信息，没有事实认定，没有证据罗列，没有合议庭组成。按刑事诉讼法，申诉应向作出生效裁判的法院或上级法院提出，须以判决书载明的事实与程序为攻击对象；没有判决书，申诉状连引用原文都做不到。他的代理律师程海曾指出，王全璋在羁押期间至少五名家属委托的律师被拒绝会见，本人是在没有任何有效辩护的情况下完成庭审的——这本身即是法定的再审事由，但提出事由需要先有文书。据公开报道，王全璋回京后向有关部门递交了申诉材料，此后没有获得立案或答复的公开消息。他被判处的五年剥夺政治权利，按判决自刑满之日起算，约到2025年才届满（具体起算细节从未公开）。也就是说，在他出狱后的整整五年里，官方甚至不必动用新的手段：旧判决的尾巴就足够让他保持「罪犯」身份。After release, Wang Quanzhang said publicly he would challenge his conviction, but the legal road is blocked at its first step: neither he nor his family has ever obtained the full judgment. Tianjin No. 2 Court's January 28, 2019, notice gives only the charge and the sentence — no findings of fact, no evidence, no panel composition. Under the Criminal Procedure Law, a petition for retrial goes to the rendering court or a higher court and must attack the facts and procedures stated in the judgment; without a judgment, a petition cannot even quote the text it challenges. His counsel Cheng Hai pointed out that at least five family-appointed lawyers were refused access during detention and that Wang went through trial without any effective defense — itself a statutory ground for retrial, except that asserting the ground requires the document first. By public reporting, Wang submitted petition materials after returning to Beijing; no public news of acceptance or reply has followed. The five years' deprivation of political rights imposed by the verdict run from completion of the sentence, expiring around 2025 (the exact calculation has never been published). For five full years after his release, the authorities needed no new measures at all: the old verdict's tail was enough to keep him legally a "criminal."

十一、李文足的记录法：把迫害写成日记11. Li Wenzu's Method: Persecution Kept as a Diary

李文足在丈夫失踪后发展出一种独特的抗争方式：把每一次遭遇实时记录、公开发布。寻夫三年间，她的社交媒体账号构成一份逐日档案：哪天去最高法被堵、哪天律师会见被拒、哪天儿子被学校劝退，都记有日期与在场机构。丈夫出狱后，这份日记继续写：2023年逼迁期间，每一次房东毁约、每一次门口出现不明人员、6月19日断电后与供电部门的通话时间（18时报修、18时30分回电承诺、19时改口拒绝），她都逐项记录并公开。这种记录法的力量在于把「骚扰」这种难以举证的行为变成了有时间戳的文本：单独看，每次断电都可以解释为物业纠纷；连起来看，十三个住处与一次断电构成一条完整的驱赶链。这也是本站记录此案的方法论来源：档案不靠控诉，靠日期、机构与次数。During her husband's disappearance, Li Wenzu developed a distinctive method of resistance: recording every incident in real time and publishing it. Across the three searching years, her social media accounts form a day-by-day archive — which date she was blocked at the Supreme Court, which date a lawyer's visit was refused, which date their son was pressed out of school — each entry carrying dates and the agencies present. The diary continued after his release: during the 2023 evictions, every landlord cancellation, every appearance of unidentified men at the door, and the June 19 power-cut call log (report filed at 18:00, a callback promising action at 18:30, a refusal at 19:00) were itemized and published. The power of this method is that it turns "harassment" — conduct notoriously hard to prove — into timestamped text: a single power cut can always be explained as a property dispute, but thirteen homes and one cut line, taken together, form a complete chain of expulsion. It is also the methodological source of this site's own record of the case: an archive rests not on denunciation but on dates, institutions, and counts.

十二、吊照潮：执业权作为最后一道惩罚12. The License Purge: The Right to Work as the Final Punishment

709案的惩罚链在刑期之外还有一环：执业资格。2018年起，多名709律师与代理过709案件的律师被吊销或注销执业证：为王全璋奔走的余文胜2018年1月被注销执业证后随即被捕，后被判刑四年；李和平、谢燕益等获释律师的执业证也被注销或不予年检。王全璋本人的执业证在其被关押期间即已被注销——这意味着2020年他走出监狱时，失去的不只是四年自由，还有此后谋生的资格：一名45岁的法学院毕业生，不能当律师，不能以律师身份代理申诉，连自己案件的申诉都要另请他人。司法行政部门以年检、注销等行政手段完成这一步，不需要任何新的判决。把这一环补进档案，709案的完整惩罚结构才看得清：先抓人，再判刑，再吊照，最后用监控与逼迁管理余生——四个阶段，分别由公安、法院、司法局与属地维稳系统执行。The 709 punishment chain has one more link beyond prison terms: the right to practice. From 2018, a series of 709 lawyers — and lawyers who had represented 709 detainees — had their licenses revoked or cancelled. Yu Wensheng, who had campaigned for access to Wang Quanzhang, had his license cancelled in January 2018 and was immediately arrested, later serving four years; released lawyers such as Li Heping and Xie Yanyi also lost their licenses to revocation or refused annual registration. Wang Quanzhang's own license was cancelled while he was imprisoned — so when he walked out in 2020 he had lost not only four years of freedom but his livelihood thereafter: a 45-year-old law graduate who cannot practice, cannot represent his own petition as counsel, and must hire others even to challenge his own case. The justice administration accomplished this step through registrations and cancellations, needing no new verdict. With this link restored, the full punishment structure of 709 becomes visible: arrest, sentencing, disbarment, and finally a managed life of surveillance and evictions — four stages executed respectively by the police, the courts, the justice bureaus, and the local stability-maintenance system.

十三、羁押地点的三年黑箱：2018年才确认人在天津13. Three Years of Not Knowing Where He Was: Tianjin Confirmed Only in 2018

王全璋案在2015至2018年间最基本的未知数，是他关在哪里。家属收到的文书只写「指定居所监视居住」，不写地点；李文足辗转于北京、天津两地公安与看守所之间打听，得到的答复始终是查无此人或无可奉告。直到2018年7月——他失联近三年后——家属才经同行律师辗转证实他羁押在天津。这一事实在当时的国际报道中被反复引用，因为它意味着：在一个自称法治的国家，一名律师的妻子用了三年时间，才打听到丈夫被关押的城市。这期间，家属委托的律师每一次会见申请都以「涉及国家安全」被拒，而拒绝的前提恰恰是家属连关押机关都无法确认。2018年确认地点后，局面没有实质改变：会见仍被拒，案件在同年12月秘密开庭。黑箱的门开了一条缝，里面仍是黑的。Between 2015 and 2018 the most basic unknown in Wang Quanzhang's case was where he was held. The documents his family received said only "residential surveillance at a designated location," without the location; Li Wenzu shuttled between public security organs and detention centers in Beijing and Tianjin asking, and the answer was always "no such person" or "nothing to tell you." Only in July 2018 — nearly three years after he vanished — did the family confirm through fellow lawyers that he was detained in Tianjin. International reporting of the time cited the fact repeatedly, because it meant that in a state professing rule of law, a lawyer's wife needed three years to learn the city in which her husband was jailed. Throughout, every meeting application by family-appointed lawyers was refused on "state security" grounds — refusals premised on the family being unable even to confirm the detaining authority. Confirmation in 2018 changed nothing in substance: visits were still refused, and the case went to secret trial that December. The black box opened a crack, and inside it was still black.

十四、一个家庭的十年总账（2015—2026）14. One Family's Decade, Totalled (2015–2026)

把这个家庭的十年按年份结账，可以看清惩罚的累进结构。2015年：丈夫失联，儿子两岁，妻子开始寻夫。2016年：丈夫被批捕，会见全拒。2017年：妻子剃发抗议，律师余文胜因代理此案被盯上。2018年：千里寻夫被遣返；联合国认定任意拘留；丈夫秘密受审。2019年：丈夫判刑四年半；妻子时隔四年见到他；六岁的儿子被迫退学。2020年：丈夫刑满，被送济南「隔离」，迟到三周才团聚。2021—2022年：全家在监控中生活，丈夫申诉无下文。2023年：两个月内搬家十三次，断电、守门成为日常。2024—2025年：剥夺政治权利期届满前后，全家仍居北京、仍受监控，无新的公开司法动作。2026年：儿子已经十三岁——他从两岁起的人生，每一年都有一项与父亲案件有关的记录。这不是一个案件拖了十年，而是一个家庭被一个案件管理了十年。Totalling this family's decade year by year shows the punishment's cumulative structure. 2015: the husband vanishes; the son is two; the wife begins her search. 2016: the husband is formally arrested; all visits refused. 2017: the wife shaves her head in protest; lawyer Yu Wensheng is targeted for representing the case. 2018: the 100-kilometre search ends in her seizure and return; the UN finds arbitrary detention; the husband is secretly tried. 2019: the husband is sentenced to four and a half years; the wife sees him for the first time in four years; their six-year-old son is forced out of school. 2020: the husband completes his sentence, is banished to Jinan for "quarantine," and reunites with his family three weeks late. 2021–2022: the family lives under surveillance; his petition goes unanswered. 2023: thirteen forced moves in two months; power cuts and door-watchers become routine. 2024–2025: around the expiry of his deprivation of political rights, the family remains in Beijing, still monitored, with no new public judicial action. 2026: the son is now thirteen — every year of his life since age two carries an entry belonging to his father's case. This is not a case that lasted ten years; it is a family that has been administered by a case for ten years.

十五、709家属群体：从各自寻夫到共同发声15. The 709 Families: From Searching Alone to Speaking Together

王全璋案不能只记李文足一人。709之后，被抓律师的妻子们逐渐形成一个互相声援的群体：李和平的妻子王峭岭、谢燕益的妻子原珊珊、翟岩民的妻子刘二敏等人，与李文足一起递状、旁听、接受采访、互相照看孩子。2017年12月的集体剃发、2018年声援王全璋开庭的集体行动，都出自这个群体。她们的共同处境也被逐项记录过：被房东解约、被国保约谈、孩子入学受阻、出境被限制。这个群体在国际上被称为「709妻子」，多次受邀与到访的外国政要会面——2018年默克尔会见李文足即是其中一次。2019年之后，随着各案陆续宣判、出狱，这个群体转入低调，但在家属有人被逼迁、被断电时，仍能看到她们互相转发、互相作证的记录。把这一节补进王全璋的档案，是因为他的案子之所以没有沉底，一半靠法律界的同行，一半靠这个由妻子们组成的、没有任何组织名称的网络。Wang Quanzhang's case cannot be recorded through Li Wenzu alone. After 709, the wives of the detained lawyers gradually formed a mutual-support circle — Wang Qiaoling (Li Heping's wife), Yuan Shanshan (Xie Yanyi's wife), Liu Ermin (Zhai Yanmin's wife) and others — filing petitions together, attending hearings together, giving interviews, and looking after one another's children. The collective head-shaving of December 2017 and the joint actions around Wang's 2018 trial both came from this circle. Their shared treatment is also on record item by item: leases cancelled, summonses from state security, children blocked at school, exit restrictions. Known internationally as the "709 wives," they were repeatedly invited to meet visiting foreign leaders — Merkel's 2018 meeting with Li Wenzu was one instance. After 2019, as verdicts and releases came, the circle lowered its profile, but when one family faces eviction or a power cut, the others still amplify and corroborate each other's records. This section belongs in Wang's file because his case never sank from view thanks half to his professional colleagues and half to this nameless network of wives.

十六、出狱后的生计与公开痕迹16. Livelihood and Public Trace After Release

按档案要求，对王全璋2020年出狱后的公开痕迹如实记录，并注明缺失。他出狱后不再是执业律师，靠什么维持生计，公开报道极少提及，本站不作推测。他在社交媒体上保留账号，偶尔发布内容，李文足的账号则持续记录全家的居住与监控状况——2023年逼迁系列记录即出自她的账号。2024年至2026年，关于他的公开报道稀少：没有新的案件，没有获准出境的报道，也没有恢复执业的消息；人权组织在709十周年（2025年7月）的回顾中，仍把他的个案列为「出狱后持续受压」的样本。一份完整的档案应当同时记录「有」与「无」：对王全璋而言，2020年之后的大部分年份，「无新消息」本身就是状态——一个被判刑的律师出狱六年，社会能查到的关于他的新闻，只剩下搬家与断电。As an archive requires, Wang Quanzhang's public trace after his 2020 release is recorded as it stands, with gaps marked. He is no longer a practicing lawyer; what he lives on is rarely mentioned in public reporting, and this page does not speculate. He keeps a social media account and posts occasionally, while Li Wenzu's account continues to document the family's housing and surveillance — the 2023 eviction records came from her account. From 2024 to 2026, public reporting about him is sparse: no new case, no report of permission to leave China, no news of a restored license. In their tenth-anniversary retrospectives on 709 (July 2025), rights organizations still list his case as a specimen of "continued pressure after release." A complete archive must record both presence and absence: for Wang, in most years after 2020, "no news" is itself the status — six years after a sentenced lawyer's release, the only findable news about him is evictions and a power cut.

另有一项档案长期缺失：他的健康。2019年6月那次会见之后，李文足公开担忧长期隔绝关押与传闻中的酷刑已损害他的精神状态；2020年出狱后流出的影像中，他明显消瘦。此后六年，他的健康状况没有任何公开更新——没有体检信息，没有就医记录，也没有官方说明。家属偶尔发布的全家照片，是外界判断他状态的唯一依据。本站按档案标准将此项标注为：2019年有家属陈述，2020年有影像，此后无可查证信息。一份档案里，空白也要写明空白的位置。One item in this file has long been missing: his health. After the June 2019 visit, Li Wenzu said publicly that long isolation and reported torture appeared to have damaged his mental state; in images that emerged after his 2020 release he was visibly gaunt. In the six years since, there has been no public update on his health — no examination information, no treatment records, no official statement. Occasional family photographs posted by his wife are the only basis on which the outside world can judge his condition. By archival standards this page marks the item as follows: a family account exists for 2019, images exist for 2020, and nothing verifiable exists after that. In an archive, a blank must also state where the blank is.

本站点评Our Take

王全璋案的每一步都有名目：关押叫监视居住，秘密审判叫涉及国家秘密，出狱后的遣送叫防疫隔离，逼迁叫房东自愿解约。这套制度最熟练的本事，是给每一次违法都配一个行政词汇。三年半不许见律师，出狱后两个月内搬家十三次，惩罚从不落在判决书上，也就从不受刑期约束。当迫害可以无限续期，判几年其实不重要——重要的是对方手里永远留着下一招。Every step of Wang Quanzhang's case came with a label: detention was called residential surveillance, the secret trial was called state secrets, post-release banishment was called quarantine, and forced evictions were called landlords voluntarily ending leases. The system's most practiced skill is assigning an administrative word to every unlawful act. Three and a half years without a lawyer, and thirteen homes lost after a five-year sentence: the punishment never appears in the judgment, so no sentence limits it. When persecution can be renewed indefinitely, the length of the term hardly matters — what matters is that the other side always holds a next move.

来源：中国人权捍卫者（CHRD）王全璋个案档案；联合国任意拘留问题工作组第62/2018号意见；天津市第二中级人民法院2019年1月28日通告；自由亚洲电台2023年6月关于断电与逼迁的报道；国际特赦组织、欧盟对外行动署2019—2020年声明；李文足本人公开记录。Sources: Chinese Human Rights Defenders case file on Wang Quanzhang; UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Opinion No. 62/2018; Tianjin No. 2 Intermediate Court notice of January 28, 2019; Radio Free Asia reporting on the power cut and forced moves, June 2023; Amnesty International and European External Action Service statements, 2019–2020; Li Wenzu's own public record.

← 返回人物索引← Back to people index