EndCCPWorld.com

China: Archive of Communist Crimes & Victims
ARCHIVE / MEMORY / EVIDENCE

Let History Be Seen
Let Victims Be Remembered

Hu Jintao (1942–)

The CCP's supreme leader from 2002 to 2012, architect of the "harmonious society" slogan. His decade saw the Tibet March 14 crackdown (2008), the Xinjiang July 5 crackdown (2009), and the construction of a nationwide stability-maintenance system whose budget at one point exceeded military spending. The Hu era was mild in manner and iron-fisted in method: high-speed economic growth alongside total political lockdown. This page documents his major decisions of repression.

Lifespan
December 21, 1942 (Taizhou, Jiangsu; ancestral home Jixi, Anhui) – living
In power
November 2002 – November 2012 (10 years)
Positions
General Secretary of the CCP, President of China, Chairman of the Central Military Commission
Key crimes
Tibet March 14 crackdown (2008), Xinjiang July 5 crackdown (2009), systematic suppression of dissidents (Liu Xiaobo, Gao Zhisheng and others), construction of the weiwen system

Contents

1. The Youth League heir: from Tibet to Zhongnanhai

Hu Jintao was born in 1942 in Taizhou, Jiangsu (ancestral home Jixi, Anhui), graduated from Tsinghua University's hydraulics department in 1965, and spent his career in the Communist Youth League system — leader of the so-called "Youth League faction." In 1988 he was posted to Tibet as Party secretary. In March 1989, when Tibetan protests erupted in Lhasa, Hu ordered martial law and sent in armed police to crush them. That "merit" stuck in Deng Xiaoping's memory — here was a man willing to be ruthless at the critical moment.

In 1992, the 50-year-old Hu was designated by Deng as the heir-apparent a generation down ("core of the fourth-generation leadership") and entered the Politburo Standing Committee. In 2002, at the 16th Party Congress, he took the General Secretary post from Jiang Zemin. Unlike Jiang, Hu was introverted and averse to the limelight; official media called him "close to the people." But insiders knew he was more resolute than Jiang on "stability maintenance."

Hu promoted slogans like "harmonious society" (2004) and the "scientific outlook on development," trying to drape CCP rule in a gentler cloth. But the substance of "harmony" was: no dissonant voices allowed. Whoever spoke out would be "harmonized."

Sources: Cheng Xiaonong on Chinese politics in the Hu era; Selected Works of Hu Jintao; analyses of the "Youth League faction."

2. Tibet, March 14, 2008: gunfire on the plateau

Causes: On March 10, 2008 (the 49th anniversary of the 1959 Tibetan uprising), monks from Drepung Monastery in Lhasa marched to demand religious freedom and were dispersed by armed police. On March 14, the protests turned into large-scale rioting; some Tibetans attacked Han Chinese shops. The authorities said 18 "innocent civilians" died (mostly Han); Tibetan sources put the death toll far higher.

The crackdown: From March 15, Beijing poured armed police and public security into Tibet; Lhasa was placed under martial law. Troops sealed off monasteries; monks from Drepung, Sera, and Ganden were herded into "patriotic education." Thousands of Tibetans were arrested, according to the Tibetan government-in-exile. Tibet remained under long-term military control afterward; foreign journalists were barred.

Disputed death tolls:

SourceFigureNotes
Chinese government18 civilians + 1 police officer deadOfficial line: victims mostly Han Chinese
Tibetan government-in-exile200+ deadBased on exile testimony; cannot be independently verified
International mediaDozens to over a hundredBased on eyewitness reports; blockade made verification impossible

After March 14, self-immolations began across Tibetan areas. From 2009 until Hu left office in 2012, well over a hundred Tibetans had self-immolated (exact figures impossible under the information blockade). The Hu government's response was tighter control and severed communications — not addressing Tibetan grievances.

This archive's position: whatever violence occurred during the riots, the military lockdown of an entire ethnic region, monastery controls, and mass arrests amounted to collective punishment. As supreme decision-maker, Hu Jintao bears direct responsibility for the hardline policies after March 14.

Sources: International Campaign for Tibet reports; Tibetan government-in-exile white papers; New York Times and Guardian reporting, March 2008; Xinhua dispatches.

3. Xinjiang, July 5, 2009: the night in Urumqi

Causes: On July 5, 2009, Uyghurs marched in Urumqi to protest the killing of Uyghur workers in a June toy-factory brawl in Shaoguan (officially 2 dead). The march turned into rioting; some Uyghurs attacked Han civilians. That night, armed police opened fire.

Crackdown and retaliation: From the night of July 5 through July 7, Urumqi was under martial law as troops entered the city. Official statistics put the death toll at 197 (authorities said mostly Han) with 1,700+ injured. Xinjiang then launched a massive "strike hard" campaign; thousands of Uyghurs were arrested. By the end of 2009, Urumqi courts had handed down death sentences (immediate execution) in multiple cases.

July 5 became the turning point for Xinjiang policy. Before it, Xinjiang was controlled but not yet at the later "re-education camp" level. Afterward, Beijing opted for the "iron fist": more armed police garrisons, "bilingual education" (de facto Han assimilation), tighter religious controls. These policies paved the way for the Xi era's mass internment.

Death toll: The official figure is 197 dead. Uyghur exile groups say the real toll was far higher and that most of the dead were Uyghurs shot by armed police. The information blockade makes independent verification impossible.

Sources: Human Rights Watch reporting on the July 5 incident; Uyghur Human Rights Project reports; Chinese government white paper Development and Progress in Xinjiang.

4. The weiwen machine: buying "harmony" with money

The Hu era's biggest "institutional innovation" was building a nationwide stability-maintenance (weiwen) system. In 2007, Beijing created the Central Leading Group for Stability Maintenance Work, with Zhou Yongkang (then Standing Committee member and secretary of the Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission) as the "weiwen czar."

The machine included: domestic-security police, armed-police mobile divisions, internet censors, community grid workers, and the interception of petitioners. In 2011, China's weiwen spending ("public security expenditure") exceeded the military budget for the first time — 624.4 billion yuan for public security versus 601.1 billion for defense, according to official figures. The number speaks for itself: what this regime fears most is not foreign enemies but its own people.

Another pillar was "intercepting petitioners." Local governments' Beijing liaison offices hired "black security" to grab petitioners near Beijing South Station and the State Bureau for Letters and Calls, locking them in "black jails" (extralegal detention sites). The practice peaked in the Hu years and only tapered after media exposure around 2013.

Sources: Chinese Ministry of Finance budget reports (2008–2012); Caijing magazine's investigations into "black jails"; Human Rights Watch reporting on China's weiwen system.

5. Crushing dissent: Liu Xiaobo, Gao Zhisheng, Ai Weiwei

Liu Xiaobo: In December 2008, Liu co-authored Charter 08 demanding democratic reform. In December 2009 he was sentenced to 11 years for "inciting subversion of state power." In 2010 he won the Nobel Peace Prize; Beijing was furious and sanctioned Norway. Liu died in custody in 2017 — the first Nobel Peace laureate to die in detention.

Gao Zhisheng: The rights lawyer was disbarred in 2006 for taking Falun Gong cases and writing open letters criticizing the government; "disappeared" in 2007 (later confirmed secretly detained and tortured). After repeated disappearances from 2010 onward, he vanished again in August 2017; his whereabouts remain unknown.

Ai Weiwei: The artist was seized at Beijing airport in April 2011 and held for 81 days over his investigations into shoddy "tofu-dreg" school construction in the Sichuan earthquake and his criticism of the government. The official charge was "economic crimes"; international opinion widely saw it as political retaliation.

The common thread: Hu-era suppression of dissidents no longer used Mao-style mass campaigns but proceeded "according to law" — charging dissidents with "inciting subversion," "picking quarrels," or "economic crimes" and sending them to prison. Repression in legal dress is harder to resist than the Cultural Revolution's open violence.

Sources: Liu Xiaobo, No Enemies, No Hatred; Gao Zhisheng, 2017, Rise Up China; Ai Weiwei studio documentaries; Amnesty International reports.

6. How it worked: nine dragons ruling the waters

The Hu-era Politburo Standing Committee had nine members (2007–2012) — "nine dragons ruling the waters." Nominally collective leadership, in practice each ran his own fief: Zhou Yongkang controlled political-legal affairs (weiwen), Li Changchun propaganda, He Guoqiang discipline inspection. As General Secretary, Hu had limited leverage over the Jiang-loyalist faction among the nine (Zhou Yongkang, Zeng Qinghong's influence).

The result: the weiwen apparatus grew too big to control. Zhou Yongkang used the Political and Legal Affairs Commission to build a "second power center" independent of the General Secretary. The problem was only superficially solved when Xi Jinping took down Zhou in his "anti-corruption" drive — Xi's solution was concentrating even more power in his own hands, not building institutional checks.

Hu himself was clearly the final sign-off on major crackdown decisions (March 14, July 5). But cautious by temperament and unwilling to own personal responsibility, he always acted in the name of "collective decisions." That kind of banal evil makes accountability all the harder.

Sources: Cheng Xiaonong on Hu-era politics; Caijing reporting on the Zhou Yongkang case; David Shambaugh, China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation.

7. Controversies

The official line ("harmonious society"): The CCP credits Hu with "upholding the scientific outlook on development" and "promoting comprehensive economic and social development." At the 20th Party Congress in 2022, footage of the 80-year-old Hu being escorted from the hall went global; officials said he was "unwell," though most observers read it as Xi asserting dominance.

Liberal critics: They call Hu a caretaker who "did not rock the boat" (his own phrase) — but also did nothing on political reform. Liu Xiaobo said before his death: "Hu's biggest problem was turning 'don't rock the boat' into 'do nothing,' and 'harmony' into 'suppression.'"

Leftist nostalgia: Some on the left miss the Hu years as "the last mild era." That nostalgia owes much to contrast — Xi has been harsher. But in fact the weiwen system, internet censorship, and Tibet/Xinjiang policies of the Hu years all paved Xi's road.

This archive's position: Hu's "mildness" was cosmetic. The weiwen system he built, the Tibet and Xinjiang crackdowns he ordered, and the systematic jailing of dissidents are well documented. Whitewashing Hu as a "moderate" does his victims no justice.

8. Historical impact

Hu stepped down in November 2012, handing over the General Secretary and CMC posts simultaneously — a rarity in CCP history. But the weiwen system he left behind was inherited intact by Xi Jinping and pushed to extremes: the Xinjiang re-education camps, the Hong Kong National Security Law, the social-credit system — all have prototypes in the Hu years.

On October 22, 2022, at the closing session of the 20th Party Congress, the 80-year-old Hu was physically removed from the hall. The image circled the globe as a symbol of Xi's "one man rules." A former supreme leader could not even sit through the meeting — the ultimate irony for the "elder politics" era.

And the wounds in Tibet and Xinjiang have never healed. Self-immolated Tibetans, Uyghurs in re-education camps, Liu Xia's years under house arrest before being allowed abroad — all legacies of the Hu era.

9. Tibet 1989: from the Panchen Lama's death to martial law in Lhasa

Section 1 says Hu "made his name" in Tibet in 1989; this section records what that meant, because it is the starting point for understanding his later rule. Hu was transferred from Guizhou to Party secretary of the Tibet Autonomous Region in December 1988 and arrived in Lhasa in January 1989, immediately facing two crises. The first was the Tenth Panchen Lama. In January 1989, at Tashi Lhunpo Monastery in Shigatse, during ceremonies for a newly completed stupa hall housing earlier Panchen Lamas' relics, the Panchen Lama said publicly that the price Tibet had paid for its development over thirty years exceeded the gains — a rare, sweeping criticism of Tibet policy from inside the system. On January 28 he died at Tashi Lhunpo, officially of a heart attack, aged 50. Claims in Tibetan exile circles that his death was suspicious have never been supported by independently verifiable evidence and are recorded here as unverified. Two facts are solid: his death removed the one figure who could speak for Tibetans from inside the establishment, and the search for his reincarnation — a process seated at Tashi Lhunpo — became a contest between Beijing and the Dalai Lama that culminated in 1995 in the disappearance of the Dalai Lama-recognized child. That sequel lies beyond this page, but its roots are here.

The second crisis was the March unrest. On March 5, 1989, monks marched in Lhasa marking a year since monks had been shot outside the Jokhang; the protest became three days of riot and suppression — stones thrown, Han shops burned, one policeman thrown from a roof and killed, and security forces opening fire repeatedly. The death toll has never been independently established, and the figures must be kept apart: Chinese official reporting at the time gave the lowest numbers, acknowledging only from a dozen or so to a few dozen deaths and stressing the dead policeman and civilians among them; journalists and researchers who reconstructed the days estimated dozens to over a hundred; exile organizations and some overseas commentary claimed several hundred, with one Jamestown Foundation analysis offering a wide range of 100 to 700 — a range whose width itself signals thin evidence. This page adopts no single figure. Three facts are not in dispute: security forces fired, the great majority of the dead were Tibetan civilians, and foreign journalists were then expelled, making verification impossible.

The decision chain is documented in outline: at Hu's request, as multiple overseas outlets and research institutes recount it, Premier Li Peng signed the State Council order on March 7, and martial law took effect in Lhasa on March 8, 1989 — the first time the PRC government had ever publicly declared martial law in Lhasa, more than two months before Beijing's. Troops and armed police flooded in; foreigners were ordered out. A photograph of Hu in a steel helmet and military dress reviewing armed police during this period circulated widely; sources differ on its exact date (not independently verified), but it became the first national symbol of Hu Jintao — a provincial secretary willing to give the order and to stand in front of the ranks. After the June crackdown in Beijing, Hu was among the first provincial-level leaders to cable support for the Center's decision. When Deng later designated him successor across a generation, the Tibet page of his file was the one nobody in the leadership needed explained.

Sources: Jamestown Foundation, "Hu Jintao and the Tibetan Issue"; Heritage Foundation retrospective on the February–March 1989 Lhasa events; Central Tibetan Administration, Tibet's Stolen Child (Panchen Lama's death, January 28, 1989, and official cause); AFP and Reuters reporting from Lhasa, March 1989.

10. July 5 at the center: cutting short the G8 trip and the July 8 Standing Committee

Section 3 covered the Ürümqi violence; this section records the central-level decisions, where Hu's personal role is documented most clearly. On July 5, 2009, the day the riots erupted, Hu was on a state visit to Italy. His itinerary included the G8 summit at L'Aquila and a subsequent visit to Portugal. On July 8 he cut the trip short and flew home; State Councilor Dai Bingguo attended the G8 in his place and the Portugal leg was postponed. For a sitting paramount leader to abandon a major multilateral summit over a domestic disturbance was, in the reform era, close to unprecedented — the move itself graded the event in Beijing's eyes. On the evening of July 8, hours after landing, Hu chaired a Politburo Standing Committee meeting. The Xinhua communiqué that followed the next day stated the meeting's line: stability in Xinjiang was "the most important and most pressing task"; organizers and violent offenders were to be severely punished under law; and the authorities were to "isolate and crack down on the tiny few" while uniting and educating the majority. Standing Committee member Zhou Yongkang was dispatched to Xinjiang to direct stability work on the ground. The reinforcements, sweeps, and fast-track trials of the following months (Section 3) ran on the mandate set that night. In August, Hu visited Xinjiang in person and publicly endorsed the regional leadership's handling. Read together with the local record, the division of labor is plain: the region executed the "strike hard"; the Center supplied the authorization, the political characterization, and the endorsement. Neither half works without the other.

Sources: Xinhua dispatches, July 8–9, 2009 (Hu's return; Standing Committee meeting); Kyodo reporting on the curtailed Italy trip; English Wikipedia, "July 2009 Ürümqi riots" (itinerary change; Zhou Yongkang's dispatch).

11. 2010–2012: weiwen becomes permanent — the Liu Xiaobo timeline and the center's Inner Mongolia response

Sections 4 and 5 described the system and its cases; this section adds three dated central-level markers. First, the full Liu Xiaobo timeline. Liu was taken from his home on December 8, 2008, two days before Charter 08's planned release. He was tried at Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People's Court on December 23, 2009, in a hearing of about two hours from which his wife Liu Xia was barred; on December 25 — Christmas Day — the court sentenced him to 11 years' imprisonment plus two years' deprivation of political rights for "inciting subversion of state power," based on Charter 08 and six articles. On February 9, 2010, the Beijing High People's Court rejected his appeal. On October 8, 2010, the Norwegian Nobel Committee awarded him the Peace Prize; at the December 10 ceremony his chair stood empty. A sentence of that length, in that political season, was not a local court's improvisation; it expressed the will of the central leadership Hu convened.

Second, the center's response to the May 2011 Inner Mongolia protests (the local handling is covered on this site's Hu Chunhua page; only the central layer is recorded here). On May 10, 2011, the Mongol herder Mergen was run over and killed while blocking coal trucks; from May 25, protests spread through Xilinhot and Hohhot — the largest Mongol demonstrations in two decades. The regional authorities moved fast against individuals: the truck driver was tried and executed, some mines were suspended. Beijing's other track was Hu's: on May 30, Hu chaired a Politburo meeting devoted to "strengthening and innovating social management." The Xinhua readout, carried by AFP, judged that China had entered a period of prominent social contradictions, called the task extremely urgent, and demanded a stronger public-security system. A local protest answered with case-by-case concessions on the ground and a Politburo-level mobilization for social control at the center — that pairing was the Hu-era weiwen method in miniature. Third, the institutional marker of permanence: the May 2010 central Xinjiang Work Forum, attended by all nine Standing Committee members, set a security-first framework for Xinjiang policy under Zhou Yongkang's political-legal apparatus; and in 2011 public-security spending exceeded the military budget for the first time (Section 4). By the time Hu stepped down, weiwen had ceased to be a campaign and had become standing machinery. How that machinery was later used is beyond his tenure; the blueprint was drawn in these years, at meetings he chaired.

Sources: Chinese Human Rights Defenders, Liu Xiaobo case timeline; UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion No. 15/2011 (trial and sentencing dates); Xinhua readouts, July 2009 and May 30, 2011, via AFP; Congressional-Executive Commission on China hearing record on the May 2010 Xinjiang Work Forum.

Sources & Further Reading

  1. Cheng Xiaonong, works on Chinese politics in the Hu era
  2. International Campaign for Tibet: reports on the March 2008 events
  3. Human Rights Watch: reporting on July 5 and its aftermath
  4. Liu Xiaobo, No Enemies, No Hatred
  5. Gao Zhisheng, 2017, Rise Up China
  6. Chinese Ministry of Finance: central budget reports 2008–2012 (public security spending)
  7. David Shambaugh, China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation
  8. Caijing magazine: investigations into the Zhou Yongkang case and the weiwen system
  9. Jamestown Foundation, "Hu Jintao and the Tibetan Issue" (1989 Lhasa shooting estimates and martial-law timeline)
  10. Heritage Foundation, retrospective on the February–March 1989 Lhasa events (armed-police show of force; martial law dates)
  11. Xinhua dispatches: July 8–9, 2009 (curtailed trip; Standing Committee meeting) and May 30, 2011 (Politburo social-management meeting)
  12. UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Opinion A/HRC/WGAD/2011/15 (Liu Xiaobo trial and sentencing dates)
  13. Central Tibetan Administration, Tibet's Stolen Child (Panchen Lama's death on January 28, 1989, and the official cause)

Contact: endccpworld@proton.me